Contextualisms in epistemology
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Contextualisms in epistemology
Springer, c2005
Available at / 2 libraries
-
No Libraries matched.
- Remove all filters.
Note
"Reprinted from Erkenntnis 61 Nos. 2-3 (November 2004)"
Includes bibliographical references
Description and Table of Contents
Description
Contextualism has become one of the leading paradigms in contemporary epistemology. According to this view, there is no context-independent standard of knowledge, and as a result, all knowledge ascriptions are context-sensitive. Contextualists contend that their account this analysis allows us to resolve some major epistemological problems such as skeptical paradoxes and the lottery paradox, and that it helps us explain various other linguistic data about knowledge ascriptions. The apparent ease with which contextualism seems to solve numerous epistemological quandaries has inspired the burgeoning interest in it.
This comprehensive anthology collects twenty original essays and critical commentaries on different aspects of contextualism, written by leading philosophers on the topic. The editors' introduction sketches the historical development of the contextualist movement and provides a survey and analysis of its arguments and major positions. The papers explore, inter alia, the central problems and prospects of semantic (or conversational) contextualism and its main alternative approaches such as inferential (or issue) contextualism, epistemic contextualism, and virtue contextualism. They also investigate the connections between contextualism and epistemic particularism, and between contextualism and stability accounts of knowledge.
Table of Contents
Contextualist Approaches to Epistemology: Problems and Prospects.- Externalism and Modest Contextualism.- Skepticism, Information, and Closure: Dretske's Theory of Knowledge.- What's Wrong with Contextualism, and a Noncontextualist Resolution of the Skeptical Paradox.- Contextualism and the Skeptic: Comments on Engel.- How to Be an Anti-Skeptic and a Noncontextualist.- Are Knowledge Claims Indexical?.- In Defense of Indexicalism: Comments on Davis.- Keeping the Conversational Score: Constraints for an Optimal Contextualist Answer?.- Knowledge, Reflection and Sceptical Hypotheses.- Inferential Contextualism, Epistemological Realism and Scepticism: Comments on Williams.- Epistemic Contextualism.- Why Epistemic Contextualism Does Not Provide an Adequate Account of Knowledge: Comments on Barke.- A Different Sort of Contextualism.- On the Prospects for Virtue Contextualism: Comments on Greco.- Lotteries and Contexts.- Reply to Baumann.- Defeasibility and the Normative Grasp of Context.- Moral Particularism and Epistemic Contextualism: Comments on Lance and Little.- Stability, Strength and Sensitivity: Converting Belief into Knowledge.- The Stability Theory of Knowledge and Belief Revision: Comments on Rott.
by "Nielsen BookData"
