Reclaiming difference : Caribbean women rewrite postcolonialism
著者
書誌事項
Reclaiming difference : Caribbean women rewrite postcolonialism
（New world studies）
University of Virginia Press, 2005
- : cloth
大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全3件
-
該当する所蔵館はありません
- すべての絞り込み条件を解除する
注記
Includes bibliographical references (p. [169]-182) and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
In ""Reclaiming Difference"", Carine Mardorossian examines the novels of four women writers - Jean Rhys (Dominica/UK), Maryse Conde (Guadeloupe/USA), Edwidge Danticat (Haiti/USA), and Julia Alvarez (Dominican Republic/USA) - who have radically reformulated the meanings of the national, geographical, sexual, and racial concepts through which postcolonial studies has long been representing difference. Coming from the anglophone, francophone, and hispanophone Caribbean, these writers all stage and identify with transcultural experiences that undermine the usual classification of literary texts in terms of national and regional literatures. By doing so they challenge the idea that racial and cultural identities function as stable points of reference in our unstable world. Focusing on the transformations that have taken place in postcolonial studies since the field has turned to theory, Mardorossian shows not only how these writers make use of the styles of creolization and hybridity that have dominated Caribbean and postcolonial studies in recent years but also how they distinguish themselves from the movement's leading figures by offering new articulations of the ties that link race and nation to gender and class. By extending the notion of hybridity away from racial and cultural differences in isolation from each other to a set of interdependent and criss-crossing categories, these writers challenge our simpler, normative, figurations and call for a fundamental recasting of the field's foundational terms. For scholars in postcolonial studies, Caribbean studies, literary feminist studies, and studies in comparative literature, ""Reclaiming Difference"" represents a new phase in postcolonial studies that calls for a fundamental rethinking of the field's terminology and assumptions.
「Nielsen BookData」 より
