Distinctiveness and memory
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Distinctiveness and memory
Oxford University Press, 2006
Available at 11 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Includes bibliographical references and index
HTTP:URL=http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip0513/2005015500.html Information=Table of contents
HTTP:URL=http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0638/2005015500-d.html Information=Publisher description
Contents of Works
- Basic issues
- Bizarreness
- Distinctiveness and implicit memory tests
- Distinctiveness and memory across the life span
- Distinctiveness in the social context
Description and Table of Contents
Description
The basic laboratory technique for studying distinctiveness effect in memory is the isolation paradigm, a simple test in which a list of items is presented for memorisation. All items except one are similar in some way. The different item always occurs late in the list, to allow the similarity of the precedingitems to establish a context. Subsequent memory for the different item is always better than for the similar items. In 1948, Jenkins and Postman offered the
intuitive-differential attention explanation to account for this difference in memory, that an item is remembered because it catches the subject's attention by violating the established context, so leads the subject to devote additional processing to it. It is this additional processing that accounts
for enhanced memory. Since 1948, succeeding theories have accepted and perpetuated their explanation. In fact, the isolation effect and the intuitive explanation have applied to most other memory phenomena that fall under the rubric of bizarreness, salience and novelty. The contributors to the proposed volume argue that the intuitive-differential-attention explanation and theories following from it are incorrect. The purpose of the volume is to test these currently accepted theories by
contrasting them with the results of current research on the processes supporting them. The result is a much needed restructuring of the theories.
Table of Contents
- I BASIC ISSUES
- II BIZARRENESS
- III DISTINCTIVENESS AND IMPLICIT MEMORY TESTS
- IV DISTINCTIVENESS AND MEMORY ACROSS THE LIFE SPAN
- V DISTINCTIVENESS IN THE SOCIAL CONTEXT
- VI THE NEUROSCIENCE OF DISTINCTIVENESS AND MEMORY
- VII DENOUEMENT
by "Nielsen BookData"