Church-state relations in crisis : debating neutrality
著者
書誌事項
Church-state relations in crisis : debating neutrality
Rowman & Littlefield, c2002
大学図書館所蔵 全1件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
Increasingly the Supreme Court's strict separationist, no-aid-to-religion doctrine that was in favor during the 1970s and 1980s is being challenged by a new approach aimed at equal treatment or neutrality. In Church-State Relations in Crisis, political scientist Stephen V. Monsma explores the neutrality principle and arguments for and against it. Monsma uses the Supreme Court's Mitchell v. Helms decision as the starting point for his discussion and argues that Mitchell v. Helms more directly than any other decision was based on this new idea of neutrality in Church-State relations. Monsma examines the three, strongly worded opinions of the court, and presents ten diverse essays by leading scholars analyzing the opinions and their impact on the establishment clause interpretation and public policy. Designed specifically for students of the law and religion and politics, Church-State Relations in Crisis is a well-balanced collection and an outstanding source for debate on the future of government and religion in the United States.
目次
Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 2 Mitchell vs. Helms Chapter 3 The Thomas Plurality Opinion: Yet Another Definition of Neutrality Chapter 4 The Thomas Plurality Opinion: The Subtle Dangers of Neutrality Theory Unleashed Chapter 5 The O'Connor Concurring Opinion: Interpretive Determinism and Neutrality's Pitfalls Chapter 6 The O'Connor Concurring Opinion: Acommodation and Jurisprudence Chapter 7 The Souter Dissent: Correct but Inadequate Chapter 8 The Souter Dissent: A Failed Argument Chapter 9 Neutrality in Establishment Clause Interpretation: Its Past and Future Chapter 10 Neutrality in Establishment Clause Interpretation: A Potentially Radical Right Turn Chapter 11 Neutrality and Public Policy: Hidden Public Policy Traps in Mitchell v. Helms Chapter 12 Neutrality and Public Policy: The More Things Change the More They Stay the Same Chapter 13 Concluding Observations
「Nielsen BookData」 より