Truth, error, and criminal law : an essay in legal epistemology
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Truth, error, and criminal law : an essay in legal epistemology
(Cambridge studies in philosophy and law)
Cambridge University Press, 2006
- : hc
Available at 9 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Includes bibliographical references and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
Beginning with the premise that the principal function of a criminal trial is to find out the truth about a crime, Larry Laudan examines the rules of evidence and procedure that would be appropriate if the discovery of the truth were, as higher courts routinely claim, the overriding aim of the criminal justice system. Laudan mounts a systematic critique of existing rules and procedures that are obstacles to that quest. He also examines issues of error distribution by offering the first integrated analysis of the various mechanisms - the standard of proof, the benefit of the doubt, the presumption of innocence and the burden of proof - for implementing society's view about the relative importance of the errors that can occur in a trial.
Table of Contents
- 1. Thinking about error in the law
- 2. The unraveling of reasonable doubt
- 3. Fixing the standard of proof
- 4. Innocence, the burden of proof, and the puzzle of affirmative defenses
- 5. Evaluating evidence and procedures
- 6. Silent defendants, silent witnesses, and lobotomized jurors
- 7. Confessions, poison fruit, and other exclusions
- 8. Double jeopardy and false acquittals: letting felons and judges off the hook?
- 9. Dubious motives for flawed rules: the clash between values.
by "Nielsen BookData"