The war on terrorism and the rule of law

著者

書誌事項

The war on terrorism and the rule of law

Richard M. Pious

Roxbury, c2006

  • : [pbk.]

大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全5件

この図書・雑誌をさがす

注記

Includes bibliographical references (p. 260-263) and indexes

内容説明・目次

内容説明

Pious' book provides a detailed discussion of due process issues invoked by the George W. Bush administration's war on terror. This book questions the premise that the government's obligation to protect Americans from terrorist acts leads to an inevitable tradeoff between constitutional and legal guarantees of due process. Instead, Pious argues that bringing terrorists to justice through the due process of law provides more rather than less security. The introductory chapter begins by laying out worst-case scenarios for terrorist attacks on the United States. Case studies of recent court cases document that when law enforcement takes shortcuts it may not only result in the imprisonment of innocent people, but also distorts or falsifies the intelligence needed to deploy law enforcement resources in the most efficient manner. Subsequent chapters apply this perspective to such topics as government surveillance (including warrantless surveillance), data-mining, immigration "hold and clear" hearings, the application of material support and material witness statutes, rules of evidence determining access to witnesses, the indefinite detention of American citizens and non-citizens, the use of military hearings, and the authorized and unauthorized mistreatment of detainees to obtain intelligence. Pious provides accessible, up-to-date materials such as testimony and speeches by Bush administration officials presenting their arguments for an "intelligence-driven" approach rather than a due process approach to combat terrorism, congressional testimony refuting these claims, proposed legislation to require adherence to due process of law, recent statute law delegating extensive power to government officials, and federal cases attempting to strike a balance between governmental prerogative claims and the rights of defendants. The cases have been extensively edited to make them accessible to undergraduate students and other non-lawyers. The author provides extensive commentaries and notes, some of which are based on his own research, and others that present alternative viewpoints. These are designed to stimulate students, organize class discussion, and point out further avenues of research and inquiry. Suggested readings at the end of the book provide students with a preliminary bibliography for short essays or longer research papers.

目次

  • 1. Homeland Security: Must We Trade Civil Liberties for National Security?
  • 2. Surveillance and the Patriot Act: Should There Be a 'Wall' Between Intelligence and Criminal Justice?
  • 3. Data Mining: Does the Patriot Act Infringe on Privacy Rights?
  • 4. Material Support: Does the Patriot Act Impede Freedom of Association?
  • 5. Material Witnesses: Can the Government Hold Them in Indefinite Detention?
  • 6. Hold and Clear
  • 7. Indefinite Detention of American Citizens: Is It Constitutional?
  • 8. Indefinite Detention of Enemy Combatants
  • 9. Interrogation: Are There Limits?
  • 10. Military Tribunals

「Nielsen BookData」 より

詳細情報

ページトップへ