Double vision : moral philosophy and Shakespearean drama
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Double vision : moral philosophy and Shakespearean drama
Princeton University Press, c2007
- : [pbk]
Available at 6 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Includes bibliographical references and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
"Hamlet" tells Horatio that there are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in his philosophy. In "Double Vision", philosopher and literary critic Tzachi Zamir argues that there are more things in "Hamlet" than are dreamt of - or at least conceded - by most philosophers. Making an original and persuasive case for the philosophical value of literature, Zamir suggests that certain important philosophical insights can be gained only through literature. But such insights cannot be reached if literature is deployed merely as an aesthetic sugaring of a conceptual pill. Philosophical knowledge is not opposed to, but is consonant with, the literariness of literature. By focusing on the experience of reading literature as literature and not philosophy, Zamir sets a theoretical framework for a philosophically oriented literary criticism that will appeal both to philosophers and literary critics. "Double Vision" is concerned with the philosophical understanding induced by the aesthetic experience of literature. Literary works can function as credible philosophical arguments - not ones in which claims are conclusively demonstrated, but in which claims are made plausible.
Such claims, Zamir argues, are embedded within an experiential structure that is itself a crucial dimension of knowing. Developing an account of literature's relation to knowledge, morality, and rhetoric, and advancing philosophical-literary readings of "Richard III", "Macbeth", "Romeo and Juliet", "Othello", "Antony and Cleopatra", "Hamlet", and "King Lear", Zamir shows how his approach can open up familiar texts in surprising and rewarding ways.
Table of Contents
Acknowledgments ix Introduction xi PART I: PHILOSOPHICAL CRITICISM IN THEORY 1 The Epistemological Basis of Philosophical Criticism 3 The Moral Basis of Philosophical Criticism 20 Philosophical Criticism and Contemporary Literary Studies 44 PART II: PHILOSOPHICAL CRITICISM IN PRACTICE 63 A Case of Unfair Proportions 65 Upon One Bank and Shoal of Time 92 Love Stories 112 Making Love 129 On Being Too Deeply Loved 151 Doing Nothing 168 King Lear's Hidden Tragedy 183 Appendix A: A Note on Lear's Motivation 205 Appendix B: A Note on Shakespeare and Rhetoric 211 Works Cited 213 Index 225
by "Nielsen BookData"