Asking the right questions : a guide to critical thinking

著者

• Browne, M. Neil
• Keeley, Stuart M.

書誌事項

Asking the right questions : a guide to critical thinking

M. Neil Browne, Stuart M. Keeley

Pearson Prentice Hall, c2007

8th ed

注記

Includes index

内容説明・目次

内容説明

For Courses on Critical Thinking, Argumentative Writing, Informal Logic courses, as well as Student Success courses. Asking the Right Questions is a concise, well-priced book with great examples, and it thoroughly covers critical thinking. This highly popular text helps students bridge the gap between simply memorizing or blindly accepting information, and the greater challenge of critical analysis and synthesis. It teaches them to respond to alternative points of view and develop a solid foundation for making personal choices about what to accept and what to reject. Perfect for freshman courses, this brief book does an amazingly thorough job covering critical thinking.

目次

Preface 1 The Benefit of Asking the Right Questions Introduction Critical Thinking to the Rescue The Sponge and Panning for Gold: Alternative Thinking Styles An Example of the Panning-for-Gold Approach Panning for Gold: Asking Critical Questions The Myth of the "Right Answer" Thinking and Feeling The Purpose of Asking the Question, "Who Cares?" Weak-Sense and Strong-Sense Critical Thinking The Satisfaction of Using the Panning-for-Gold Approach Trying Out New Answers Effective Communication and Critical Thinking The Importance of Practice The Right Questions 2 What Are the Issue and the Conclusion? Kinds of Issues Searching for the Issue Searching for the Author's or Speaker's Conclusion Clues to Discovery: How to Find the Conclusion Critical Thinking and Your Own Writing and Speaking Practice Exercises 3 What Are the Reasons? Reasons + Conclusion = Argument Initiating the Questioning Process Words That Identify Reasons Kinds of Reasons Keeping the Reasons and Conclusions Straight Reasons First, Then Conclusions "Fresh" Reasons and Your Growth Critical Thinking and Your Own Writing and Speaking Practice Exercises 4 What Words or Phrases Are Ambiguous? The Confusing Flexibility of Words Locating Key Terms and Phrases Checking for Ambiguity Determining Ambiguity Context and Ambiguity Ambiguity, Definitions, and the Dictionary Ambiguity and Loaded Language Limits of Your Responsibility to Clarify Ambiguity Ambiguity and Your Own Writing and Speaking Summary Practice Exercises 5 What Are the Value Conflicts and Assumptions? General Guide for Identifying Assumptions Value Conflicts and Assumptions Discovering Values From Values to Value Assumptions Typical Value Conflicts The Communicator's Background as a Clue to Value Assumptions Consequences as Clues to Value Assumptions More Hints for Finding Value Assumptions Avoiding a Typical Difficulty When Identifying Value Assumptions Finding Value Assumptions on Your Own Values and Relativism Summary Practice Exercises 6 What Are the Descriptive Assumptions? Illustrating Descriptive Assumptions Clues for Locating Assumptions Applying the Clues Avoiding Analysis of Trivial Assumptions Assumptions and Your Own Writing and Speaking Summary Practice Exercises 7 Are There Any Fallacies in the Reasoning? A Questioning Approach to Finding Reasoning Fallacies Evaluating Assumptions as a Starting Point Discovering Other Common Reasoning Fallacies Looking for Diversions Sleight of Hand: Begging the Question Summary of Reasoning Errors Expanding Your Knowledge of Fallacies Fallacies and Your Own Writing and Speaking Practice Exercises 8 How Good Is the Evidence: Intuition, Personal Experience, Testimonials, and Appeals to Authority? The Need for Evidence Locating Factual Claims Sources of Evidence Intuition as Evidence Dangers of Appealing to Personal Experience as Evidence Personal Testimonials as Evidence Appeals to Authority as Evidence Summary Practice Exercises 9 How Good Is the Evidence: Personal Observation, Research Studies, Case Examples, and Analogies? Personal Observation Research Studies as Evidence Generalizing from the Research Sample Biased Surveys and Questionnaires Critical Evaluation of a Research-Based Argument Case Examples as Evidence Analogies as Evidence Summary Practice Exercises 10 Are There Rival Causes? When to Look for Rival Causes The Pervasiveness of Rival Causes Detecting Rival Causes The Cause or A Cause Rival Causes and Scientific Research Rival Causes for Differences Between Groups Confusing Causation with Association Confusing "After this" with "Because of this" Explaining Individual Events or Acts Evaluating Rival Causes Evidence and Your Own Writing and Speaking Summary Practice Exercises 11 Are the Statistics Deceptive? Unknowable and Biased Statistics Confusing Averages Concluding One Thing, Proving Another Deceiving by Omitting Information Risk Statistics and Omitted Information Summary Practice Exercises 12 What Significant Information Is Omitted? The Benefits of Detecting Omitted Information The Certainty of Incomplete Reasoning Questions That Identify Omitted Information The Importance of the Negative View Omitted Information That Remains Missing Missing Information and Your Own Writing and Speaking Practice Exercises 13 What Reasonable Conclusions Are Possible? Assumptions and Multiple Conclusions Dichotomous Thinking: Impediment to Considering Multiple Conclusions Two Sides or Many? Searching for Multiple Conclusions Productivity of If-Clauses Alternative Solutions as Conclusions The Liberating Effect of Recognizing Alternative Conclusions All Conclusions Are Not Created Equal Summary Practice Exercises 14 Practice and Review Question Checklist for Critical Thinking Asking the Right Questions: A Comprehensive Example What Are the Issue and Conclusion? What Are the Reasons? What Words or Phrases Are Ambiguous? What Are the Value Conflicts and Assumptions? What Are the Descriptive Assumptions? Are There Any Fallacies in the Reasoning? How Good Is the Evidence? Are There Rival Causes? Are the Statistics Deceptive? What Significant Information Is Omitted? What Reasonable Conclusions Are Possible? Final Word The Tone of Your Critical Thinking Strategies for Effective Critical Thinking Index

「Nielsen BookData」 より

詳細情報

• NII書誌ID(NCID): BA79920764
• ISBN:
  • 0132203049
• LCCN: 2005032905
• 出版国コード: us
• タイトル言語コード: eng
• 本文言語コード: eng
• 出版地: Upper Saddle River, N.J.
• ページ数/冊数: xii, 212 p.
• 大きさ: 23 cm
• 分類:
  • LCC : PN83.B785
  • DC21 : 418/.4
• 件名:
  • LCSH : Criticism
  • LCSH : Critical thinking