Disciplining statistics : demography and vital statistics in France and England, 1830-1885
著者
書誌事項
Disciplining statistics : demography and vital statistics in France and England, 1830-1885
(Politics, history, and culture)
Duke University Press, 2006
- : hbk
- : pbk
大学図書館所蔵 全8件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Bibliography: p. [253]-275
Includes index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
In Disciplining Statistics Libby Schweber compares the science of population statistics in England and France during the nineteenth century, demonstrating radical differences in the interpretation and use of statistical knowledge. Through a comparison of vital statistics and demography, Schweber describes how the English government embraced statistics, using probabilistic interpretations of statistical data to analyze issues related to poverty and public health. The French were far less enthusiastic. Political and scientific elites in France struggled with the "reality" of statistical populations, wrestling with concerns about the accuracy of figures that aggregated heterogeneous groups such as the rich and poor and rejecting probabilistic interpretations.Tracing the introduction and promotion of vital statistics and demography, Schweber identifies the institutional conditions that account for the contrasting styles of reasoning. She shows that the different reactions to statistics stemmed from different criteria for what counted as scientific knowledge. The French wanted certain knowledge, a one-to-one correspondence between observations and numbers. The English adopted an instrumental approach, using the numbers to influence public opinion and evaluate and justify legislation.
Schweber recounts numerous attempts by vital statisticians and demographers to have their work recognized as legitimate scientific pursuits. While the British scientists had greater access to government policy makers, and were able to influence policy in a way that their French counterparts were not, ultimately neither the vital statisticians nor the demographers were able to institutionalize their endeavors. By 1885, both fields had been superseded by new forms of knowledge. Disciplining Statistics highlights how the development of "scientific" knowledge was shaped by interrelated epistemological, political, and institutional considerations.
目次
Acknowledgments ix
Introduction 1
Part I. The Struggle for Disciplinary Recognition: Why "Invent" a Discipline in Nineteenth-Century France
1. The "Invention" of Demography, 1853-1855 35
2. The Neglect of Demography, 1855-1867 49
3. The Reinvention of Demography, 1867-1878 67
Part II. The Institutionalization of Vital Statistics in England: How to "Secure" a Discipline in Nineteenth-Century England
4. The Invention of Vital Statistics, 1830-1837 93
5. Vital Statistics as an Instrument of Social Reform 105
Part III. The Institutionalization of Demography in France: How to "Secure" a Discipline in Nineteenth-Century France
6. Discipline Formation at Last 135
7. Limits to Institutionalization 157
Part IV. The Struggle to Retain Disciplinary Recognition: How to "Defend" a Discipline in Nineteenth-Century England
8. The Challenge to Vital Statistics 179
9. Institutional Transformations and the Introduction of Disciplinary Specialization 191
Conclusion 213
Notes 227
Bibliography 253
Index 273
「Nielsen BookData」 より