What's wrong with terrorism?
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
What's wrong with terrorism?
Polity, 2006
- : pbk
Access to Electronic Resource 1 items
Related Bibliography 1 items
Available at 6 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Includes bibliographical references (p. [218]-237) and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
Terrorists perform terrible acts. They maim, mutilate and kill in pursuit of their goals. The horrifying events of 9/11 and the regular suicide bombings around the world have made terrorism one of the central preoccupations of the twenty-first century. But what is the distinctive wrong of terrorism? Criminal acts such as murder and hijacking are already on the moral statute books, so why is it that we regard terrorists as different from and morally worse than ordinary killers and kidnappers? Some see terrorism is an ideology, others claim it is a deep-seated social or psychological failing, others that it is a form of fighting unfairly judged by just-war standards. In this provocative new book, Robert Goodin puts forward the view that terrorism is, in fact, a deliberate tactic of frightening people for socio-political gain. Fear affects peoples ability to reason clearly and undermines their capacity for autonomous self-government.
In this way, Goodin contends that terror is not only the weapon of organizations such as al-Qaeda; it also benefits democratic politicians who profit from the climate of insecurity induced by terrorist threats and violence. Political figures conducting a campaign of fear as part of their war on terrorism may therefore be committing wrongs akin to those of terrorists themselves. This, Goodin argues, is what is distinctively wrong with terrorism in the contemporary world.
Table of Contents
Preface vii
Acknowledgements x
1 Introduction 1
2 Terrorism as Unjust War: Killing Innocent Civilians 6
Three problems with the just-war analysis of terrorism 9
A different sense of 'innocence' 18
War crime, ordinary crime or a special offence? 21
3 Terrorism as a Political Tactic: Intending to Instil Fear 31
What sort of 'ism' is terrorism? 32
What terrorists want 35
Fear is the key 45
Summing up 48
4 States Can Be Terrorists, Too 50
The definitional ploy 53
States terrorizing other states 60
States terrorizing their own people 66
State-sponsored terror and crimes of complicity 73
5 Warnings Can Be Terroristic, Too: Profiting Politically from Fear 78
Threats and warnings 80
Impure warnings: 'terrorist warnings' versus 'warnings of terrorism' 85
Politicians' intentions matter, too 91
Terrorism as an aggravated wrong: is 'violence' required? 100
Better 'terrorist warnings' than none at all? 108
6 Warnings Bound to Be Misheard 111
How big a deal is terrorism? 114
Calibrating risks 118
Mechanisms of misperception 123
Mass-mediated terror 131
Risks of really mass destruction 136
Imprudent precautions 142
7 Terrorizing Democracy 156
Terrorism as a political wrong 156
Fearlessness as a response 159
Hobbesian solutions to non-Hobbesian problems 170
Of tyrants and terrorists 176
8 Conclusions 179
Notes 187
References 218
Index 238
by "Nielsen BookData"