Philosophy at the edge of chaos : Gilles Deleuze and the philosophy of difference
著者
書誌事項
Philosophy at the edge of chaos : Gilles Deleuze and the philosophy of difference
(Toronto studies in philosophy)
University of Toronto Press, c2006
- : hard
- : pbk
- タイトル別名
-
Gilles Deleuze and the philosophy of difference
大学図書館所蔵 全6件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references (p. [277]-288) and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
From the early 1960s until his death, French philosopher Gilles Deleuze (1925-1995) wrote many influential works on philosophy, literature, film, and fine art. One of Deleuze's main philosophical projects was a systematic inversion of the traditional relationship between identity and difference. This Deleuzian philosophy of difference is the subject of Jeffrey A. Bell's Philosophy at the Edge of Chaos. Bell argues that Deleuze's efforts to develop a philosophy of difference are best understood by exploring both Deleuze's claim to be a Spinozist, and Nietzsche's claim to have found in Spinoza an important precursor. Beginning with an analysis of these claims, Bell shows how Deleuze extends and transforms concepts at work in Spinoza and Nietzsche to produce a philosophy of difference that promotes and, in fact, exemplifies the notions of dynamic systems and complexity theory. With these concepts at work, Deleuze constructs a philosophical approach that avoids many of the difficulties that linger in other attempts to think about difference.
Bell uses close readings of Plato, Aristotle, Spinoza, Nietzsche, Heidegger, Derrida, and Whitehead to illustrate how Deleuze's philosophy is successful in this regard and to demonstrate the importance of the historical tradition for Deleuze. Far from being a philosopher who turns his back on what is taken to be a mistaken metaphysical tradition, Bell argues that Deleuze is best understood as a thinker who endeavoured to continue the work of traditional metaphysics and philosophy.
目次
Acknowledgments Introduction Part One. Thinking Difference * Systematic Thinking and the Philosophy of Difference * Ironing Out the Differences: Nietzsche and Deleuze as Spinozists * Philosophizing the Double Bind: Deleuze Reads Nietzsche * Pharmakon * Mimesis * Thumos * Critique without Redemption * Thinking Difference: Heidegger and Deleuze on Aristotle * Thinking and the Loss of System: Derrida and Deleuze on Artaud Part Two. Rethinking System * Rethinking System * Whitehead * Chaosmos and Expression * Dynamic Systems Conclusion: Philosophy at the Edge of Chaos Notes Bibliography Index
「Nielsen BookData」 より