The framework of judicial sentencing : a study in legal decision making
著者
書誌事項
The framework of judicial sentencing : a study in legal decision making
(Cambridge criminology series)
Cambridge University Press, 2006, c1997
- : pbk
大学図書館所蔵 全1件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
"First published 1997, This digitally printed first paperback version 2006"--T.p. verso
Bibliography: p. 272-277
Includes index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
Austin Lovegrove examines the sentencing of offenders appearing on multiple offences and how judges, having fixed a prison sentence for each offence, determine an overall sentence for each offender. Analysing judges' verbal protocols for sentencing problems and sentences for fictitious cases, he is able to offer, first, a model of judicial sentencing in the form of a decision strategy comprising working rules deduced from the given responses of judges as they attempted to apply sentencing law, and, second, a numerical guideline in the form of an algebraic model quantifying the application of the working rules. On the basis of this empirical data, Dr Lovegrove furthers understanding of the nature and place of intuition in sentencing and of how the cumulation of sentence can be integrated into a system of proportionality related to the seriousness of single offences.
目次
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Acknowledgments
- 1. Judicial decision making and sentencing policy: continuation of a study
- 2. A sentencing decision model: single and multiple similar counts
- 3. A sentencing decision model: multiple disparate counts
- 4. Testing the decision model for multiple disparate counts
- 5. The techniques of data collection
- 6. Judges' thoughts on sentencing the multiple offender
- 7. An alternative sentencing decision model for the multiple offender
- 8. Validity and development of the alternative decision model: the data collection
- 9. Towards a requisite decision model for sentencing the multiple offender
- 10. The armature of judicial sentencing
- Appendix: Case 37 from Sentencing Research Exercise - Part 3B
- References
- Index.
「Nielsen BookData」 より