The evolution of efficient common law
著者
書誌事項
The evolution of efficient common law
(An Elgar reference collection)(Economic approaches to law, 3)
Edward Elgar, c2007
大学図書館所蔵 全11件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Facsimile reprint of articles
Includes bibliographical references and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
This volume contains a selection of the most important articles on the issue of the evolution of the common law. The notion that evolutionary forces would lead to common law efficiency has been very influential in the study of the economics of law. Even those scholars who do not believe that the law is efficient will find it useful to consider the evolutionary forces identified in this volume.In an even-handed approach, Professor Rubin has selected not only articles which advance the hypothesis of efficient evolution, but also those which claim that the evolutionary process is not efficient. Further articles show that the process is indeed sometimes efficient and sometimes not, and identify those conditions which bring about more of less efficiency in the evolution of law. This authoritative collection will be useful to anyone who is concerned with the sources of efficiency and inefficiency in the law, as well as to scholars pursuing research in this area.
目次
Contents:
Acknowledgements
Introduction Paul H. Rubin
PART I THE BEGINNINGS
1. Paul H. Rubin (1977), 'Why is the Common Law Efficient?'
2. George L. Priest (1977), 'The Common Law Process and the Selection of Efficient Rules'
3. John C. Goodman (1978), 'An Economic Theory of the Evolution of Common Law'
4. R. Peter Terrebonne (1981), 'A Strictly Evolutionary Model of Common Law'
PART II THE FIRST CRITICS
5. William M. Landes and Richard A. Posner (1979), 'Adjudication as a Private Good'
6. Robert Cooter and Lewis Kornhauser (1980), 'Can Litigation Improve the Law Without the Help of Judges?'
7. Paul H. Rubin (1982), 'Common Law and Statute Law'
8. Peter H. Aranson (1992), 'The Common Law as Central Economic Planning'
PART III EVOLUTIONARY CRITICS
9. Jack Hirshleifer (1982), 'Evolutionary Models in Economics and Law: Cooperation Versus Conflict Strategy'
10. Gillian K. Hadfield (1992), 'Bias in the Evolution of Legal Rules'
11. Mark J. Roe (1996), 'Chaos and Evolution in Law and Economics'
12. Oona A. Hathaway (2001), 'Path Dependence in the Law: The Course and Pattern of Legal Change in a Common Law System'
PART IV BIASED EVOLUTION
13. Paul H. Rubin and Martin J. Bailey (1994), 'The Role of Lawyers in Changing the Law'
14. Vincy Fon and Francesco Parisi (2003), 'Litigation and the Evolution of Legal Remedies: A Dynamic Model'
PART V SPECIFIC APPLICATIONS
15. Bruce L. Benson (1989), 'The Spontaneous Evolution of Commercial Law'
16. Yoram Barzel (2000), 'Dispute and Its Resolution: Delineating the Economic Role of the Common Law'
17. Jeffrey Evans Stake (2005), 'Evolution of Rules in a Common Law System: Differential Litigation of the Fee Tail and Other Perpetuities'
18. Keith N. Hylton (2006), 'Information, Litigation, and Common Law Evolution'
19. Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer and Robert W. Vishny (1998), 'Law and Finance'
PART VI HAYEKIAN (MACRO) EFFICIENCY
20. Paul G. Mahoney (2001), 'The Common Law and Economic Growth: Hayek Might be Right'
21. Todd J. Zywicki (2003), 'The Rise and Fall of Efficiency in the Common Law: A Supply-Side Analysis'
PART VII SUMMING UP
22. Paul H. Rubin (2005), 'Micro and Macro Legal Efficiency: Supply and Demand'
Name Index
「Nielsen BookData」 より