Proving the unprovable : the role of law, science, and speculation in adjudicating culpability and dangerousness
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Proving the unprovable : the role of law, science, and speculation in adjudicating culpability and dangerousness
（American Psychology-Law Society series）
Oxford University Press, 2007
Available at / 2 libraries
-
No Libraries matched.
- Remove all filters.
Note
Includes bibliographical references and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
It is hard enough in many cases simply figuring out whether a person has committed an antisocial act. It is harder still to determine the extent to which he or she intended the act, and why he or she committed it. And most difficult of all is divining whether a person will harm again. The law has increasingly turned to mental health professionals to help address these issues, particularly the last two. Because of their familiarity with and study of human behavior,
psychiatrists, psychologists and other clinicians are thought to possess special expertise in assessing culpability and dangerousness. Members of these groups routinely furnish the courts with evaluations of insanity and other mental state at the time of the offense, and even more frequently proffer
predictions about future behavior.
Both culpability and dangerousness are exceedingly difficult to gauge; even mental health professionals well-versed in the behavioral sciences cannot claim a high degree of reliability in their efforts to address these issues. Though the current trend in evidence law is to demand a rigorous demonstration of scientific validity from expert witnesses, especially when those experts are mental health professionals proffered by the defense, this book argues that this is a mistake. Such a position
undermines the fairness of the process and could quite possibly even diminish its reliability, given the defense's constitutional entitlement to tell its story and the inscrutability of past and future mental states. At the same time, Professor Slobogin proposes a number of ways the courts can ensure
that experts provide the best possible information about ultimately unknowable past mental states and future behavior.
Table of Contents
Part I: Introduction
Chapter One: The Need for Nuance
Part II: Culpability
Chapter Two: Diagnoses, Syndromes, and Criminal Responsibility
Chapter Three: The Case for Informed Speculation
Chapter Four: Redining Probative Value
Chapter Five: Beyond Relevance
Part III: Dangerousness
Chapter Six: The Current State of the Science and the Law
Chapter Seven: Are There "Experts" on Dangerousness?
Part IV: Conclusion
Chapter Eight: The Structure of Expertise
by "Nielsen BookData"