European framework agreements and telework : law and practice, a European and comparative study
著者
書誌事項
European framework agreements and telework : law and practice, a European and comparative study
(Bulletin of comparative labour relations, 62)
Kluwer Law International, c2007
大学図書館所蔵 全12件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references
内容説明・目次
内容説明
The Framework Agreement on Telework (2002) was the first of the non-legally binding (soft law) agreements concluded by the European Social Partners - the employer organisations UNICE, CEEP, and UEAPME, and the trade union organisation ETUC. Although the forum on which this book is based focused on the telework agreement, the subject matter of the papers and discussion centred on the nature of the framework agreements themselves, on the role of the social partners, and on implications for the future of European labour law. The forum took place in Brussels with the support of the Royal Flemish Academy in September 2006.The book prints sixteen papers by distinguished labour law authorities - representing legal academic, managerial and policy dimensions - either originally presented at the forum or emerging from it. Among the far-reaching questions raised are the following: Do the framework agreements constitute a 'new way' of developing European employment law? Under what circumstances will a teleworker be able to act to obtain social protection under a framework agreement? Are we heading for a social Europe where mere recommendations, rather than labour market rules, are the norm?
And where is the line between 'regular' and 'non-regular' telework?A consensus seems to emerge that the framework agreements, in their support of the transition from 'job security' to 'employability,' are leading soft law into what may aptly be called 'liquid law.'The papers include reports on implementation and development of framework agreements in individual countries including Belgium, the Netherlands, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Sweden, the United Kingdom, as well as a report on the United States.For the important and urgent questions it raises about telework and the 'new world of work' that telework so clearly represents, this book will engage the committed attention of everyone involved in the fields and activities shaped by labour and employment law in Europe and throughout the world.
「Nielsen BookData」 より