Political authority in Burma's ethinic minority states : devolution, occupation, and coexsistence
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Political authority in Burma's ethinic minority states : devolution, occupation, and coexsistence
(Policy studies, 31)
East-West Center Washington , Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2007
Available at 8 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Includes bibliographical references (p. [61]-69)
Description and Table of Contents
Description
This study examines the enormous variation and complexity that characterize relationships between the national state and locally-based, often non-state actors who negotiate and compete for political authority in Burma's ethnic minority-dominated states along the borders.Three patterns of relationships are explored such as: devolution by the national state to warlord-like local authorities; occupation by the Burmese military; and coexistence (with varying degrees of cooperation and understanding) among actors from the national state and local stakeholders.Throughout these border states, leaders of the Burmese governments armed forces and of past and currently-active armed opposition forces operate within a context that is neither war nor peace, but instead a kind of post-civil-war, not-quite-peace environment.To understand the complex political arrangements that have arisen in this environment, this monograph employs the concept of ""emerging political complex"" - a set of adaptive networks that link state and other political authorities to domestic and foreign business concerns (some legal, others illegal), traditional indigenous leaders, religious authorities, overseas refugee and diaspora communities, political party leaders, and nongovernmental organizations. All of these players make rules, extract resources, provide protection, and try to order a moral universe, but none of them are able, or even inclined, to trump the others for monolithic national supremacy. Conflict resolution strategies have to recognize that these emerging political complexes are not simply unfortunate bumps in the road to peace but instead constitute intricate and evolving social systems that may continue to be adapted and sustained.
Table of Contents
- Political Authority in Burma's Ethnic Minority States: Devolution, Occupation, and Coexistence
- Preliminary Pages
- Introduction
- The ""State"" in Burma
- The Extremes: Devolution vs. Occupation and War
- Coexistence: Resignation, Accommodation, and Acceptance
- Conclusion
- Recommendations
- Endnotes
- Bibliography
- Project Information: Internal Conflicts and State-Building Challenges in Asia
- Policy Studies: List of Reviewers 2006-07
- Policy Studies: Previous Publications.
by "Nielsen BookData"