Evidence
著者
書誌事項
Evidence
(The examples & explanations series)
Aspen , Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, c2007
6th ed
大学図書館所蔵 全5件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
In this new edition, Arthur Best retains the features and the quality that made this E&E the bestselling evidence ancillary. The author: - provides clear explanations of all of the topics that students find difficult, including relevance, hearsay, and impeachment - presents key concepts in tables and charts for easy reference - supplies questions with varying degrees of difficulty and provides clear explanations of the analysis of those questions - designs each chapter so it includes all of the material necessary to answer the questions, providing students with an incentive to read chapters thoroughly - provides an appendix with a plain language version of the Federal Rules of Evidence, complete with new amendments to the Rules The Sixth Edition: - covers changes in Confrontation Clause analysis, reflecting Crawford v. Washington and Davis v. Washington - reflects the 2006 amendments to the Federal Rules of Evidence which clarify that character evidence to show propensity is totally barred in a civil case even if the circumstances are similar to those of a criminal case; change Rule 408 governing use of statements made in settlement negotiations, prohibiting their use for impeachment by contradiction or prior inconsistent statement, and allowing the use in criminal cases of statements made to government agents during settlement negotiations related to a civil case; tighten the prohibition in Rule 606(b) against juror testimony about errors in verdicts (allowing testimony only about mistakes in entering a verdict on a verdict form); treat a crime, for purposes of Rule 609, as involving dishonesty or false statement only if it can readily be determined thatestablishing the elements of the crime required proof or admission of an act of dishonesty or false statement
「Nielsen BookData」 より