Constitutionalism and legal reasoning : a new paradigm for the concept of law
著者
書誌事項
Constitutionalism and legal reasoning : a new paradigm for the concept of law
（Law and philosophy library, v. 79）
Springer, c2007
大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全11件
-
該当する所蔵館はありません
- すべての絞り込み条件を解除する
内容説明・目次
内容説明
This book of legal philosophy contends that positive law is better understood if it is not too easily equated with power, force, or command. Law is more a matter of discourse and deliberation than of sheer decision or of power relations. Here is thought-provoking reading for lawyers, advocates, scholars of jurisprudence, students of law, philosophy and political science, and general readers concerned with the future of the constitutional state.
目次
Preface.
Part I: Law as Constitution.
1. Rhetoric and Practical Reason. 1.1. Two Paradigms of Right Reasoning. 1. 2. From Fundamental Law to Social Contract and Self-Institution. 1. 3. Modern Constitutionalism.
2. Constitutionalism and Legal Positivism. 2.1. Law as Fact. 2.2. Legislation and Sovereignty. 2.3. The Raise of German Public Law. 2.4. Legal Positivism and Constitutionalism.
3. From State Law to Constitutional State, or, from Herrschaft to "Discourse". 3.1. Normativity and Facticity. 3.2. Normativism, Institutionalism, Decisionism. 3.3. "Wille zur Verfassung", Will of Constitution.
Part II: Legal Argumentation and Concepts of Law.
1. Rhetoric and Practical Reason. 1.1. Two Paradigms of Right Reasoning. 1.2. Theoretical Versus Practical Rationality.
2. Legal Reasoning Redeemed. 2.1. Rehabilitation of Practical Reason: the Topic. 2.2. The "New Rhetoric" School. 2.3. Philosophical Hermeneutics.
3.Contemporary Doctrines. 3.1. Neil MacCormick's Formalist Model. 3.2. Ronald Dworkin's Interpretive Turn. 3.3. Discourse Theory.
4. Law as Discourse and Constitution. 4.1. Morality Reconnected to Law. 4.2. A New Model of Democracy.
Part III: The Practice of Law and Legal Ethics.
1. "Jurists, bad Christians". 1.1. Lawyers According to the Tradition. 1.2. The Legal Positivist Myth. 1.3. Plato, Kant and Modern Jurisprudence.
2. Ambiguity of Deontological Rules. 2.1. Deontological Codes. 2.2. Civil law and Common Law.
3. Two Opposed Paradigms. 3.1. The Legalistic Approach. 3.2. The Moralistic Approach.
4. Legal Ethics and the Concept of Law. 4.1. The "Moral Amorality" Thesis. 4.2. The "Full Morality" Thesis. 4.3. A Pragmatist Alternative and the Radbruch Formula.
Epilogue.
Appendix A: Natural Law: "Exclusive" Versus "Inclusive". Appendix B: Robert Alexy's Constitutional Rights Theory.
「Nielsen BookData」 より
