Dumb beasts and dead philosophers : humanity and the humane in ancient philosophy and literature

著者

書誌事項

Dumb beasts and dead philosophers : humanity and the humane in ancient philosophy and literature

Catherine Osborne

Clarendon Press , Oxford University Press, 2007

大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全3件

この図書・雑誌をさがす

注記

Includes bibliographical references (p. [243]-248) and indexes

HTTP:URL=http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip077/2006102304.html Information=Table of contents only

内容説明・目次

内容説明

Animal rights do not feature explicitly in ancient thought. Indeed the notion of natural rights in general is not obviously present in the classical world. Plato and Aristotle are typically read as racist and elitist thinkers who barely recognise the humanity of their fellow humans. Surely they would be the last to show up as models of the humane view of other kinds? In this unusual philosophy book, Catherine Osborne asks the reader to think again. She shows that Plato's views on reincarnation and Aristotle's views on the souls of plants and animals reveal a continuous thread of life in which humans are not morally superior to beasts; Greek tragedy turns up thoughts that mirror the claims of rights activists when they speak for the voiceless; the Desert Fathers teach us to admire the natural perceptiveness of animals rather than the corrupt ways of urban man; the long tradition of arguments for vegetarianism in antiquity highlights how mankind's abuse of other animals is the more offensive the more it is for indulgent ends. What, then, is the humane attitude, and why is it better? How does the humane differ from the sentimental? Is there a truth about how we should treat animals? By reflecting on the work of the ancient poets and philosophers, Osborne argues, we can see when and how we lost touch with the natural intelligence of dumb animals.

目次

  • PART ONE: CONSTRUCTING DIVISIONS
  • PART TWO: PERCEIVING CONTINUITIES
  • PART THREE: BEING REALISTIC

「Nielsen BookData」 より

詳細情報

ページトップへ