Implementation of the environmental liability directive : sixth report of session 2006-07 : report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence
著者
書誌事項
Implementation of the environmental liability directive : sixth report of session 2006-07 : report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence
(HC, 694)
The Stationery Office, 2007
大学図書館所蔵 全3件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
内容説明・目次
内容説明
The main aim of the Environmental Liability Directive (ELD) (Directive 2004/35/CE of the European Parliament and of the Council) is to establish a mechanism to prevent and remedy significant environmental damage (including damage to protected species and habitats, water and land resources), based upon the principle of 'the polluter pays'. The Directive was adopted in April 2004 and EU member states are obliged to transpose it into domestic law by April 2007, with considerable discretion on its implementation. The UK Government has failed to meet this deadline, having launched a consultation on its proposals for implementation only at a late stage in November 2006.The Government's proposals are based on the policy approach of not going beyond the minimum requirements of a Directive unless there are exceptional circumstances justified by a cost-benefit analysis and after extensive stakeholder engagement, with the political motive of avoiding accusations of 'gold plating' of EU legislation.
The Committee's report criticises the Government for using this 'minimum implementation' approach, particularly in its unwillingness to extend the ELD to nationally-protected biodiversity, which goes against the recommendations of the Environment Agency, Natural England and other environmental organisations. The Committee calls on the Government to provide a proper justification of its policy choices that does not rely simply on the blanket approach of avoiding 'gold plating', in order to show decisions are proportionate and evidence-based.
「Nielsen BookData」 より