British relations with Sind, 1799-1843 : an anatomy of imperialism
著者
書誌事項
British relations with Sind, 1799-1843 : an anatomy of imperialism
Oxford University Press, 2007
大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全1件
-
該当する所蔵館はありません
- すべての絞り込み条件を解除する
注記
Previously published: Berkeley : University of California Press, 1962
Bibliography: p. [139]-148
Includes index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
One of the major paradoxes of the nineteenth century was the continued growth of the British Empire at a time when the home authorities opposed expansion. The annexation of the Indian state of Sind in 1843 is a notable example of forces which abetted this situation. Huttenback's study of British relations with an independent Sind from 1799 to 1843 provides valuable insight into the complexities of nineteenth-century British imperialism. Here is a thorough investigation of British activities in Sind after 1799, the actual conquest, and subsequent repercussions. Huttenback presents the whole scope of British relations with Sind from 1799 to 1843 without sacrificing the pre-annexation issues to the more romantic circumstances surrounding Sir Charles Napier and the conquest. The author is acutely aware of the dominant influence of individuals in Sind during this critical period. The motives, characteristics, and actions of major personalities are expertly drawn. He devotes great care to an honest appraisal of the role of Sir Charles Napier, commander of the British troops in Sind and responsible for the eventual conquest of Sind.
However, the author points out that, 'Actually Napier was only the last if most important actor in a drama the significance of which has never been duly appreciated.' The period involved is less than fifty years and in this short interval virtually all the factors which prompted British expansion on continents and in places far removed from the Indus Valley manifested themselves in Sind. Among these were considerations of trade, communications, and defence, all of which fostered tensions between Great Britain and Sind. But of prime importance was the great power of the 'man on the spot,' and it was the arrival of Sir Charles Napier which spurred events inexorably toward hostilities.
「Nielsen BookData」 より