War memory and social politics in Japan, 1945-2005
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
War memory and social politics in Japan, 1945-2005
(Harvard East Asian monographs, 278)
Harvard University Asia Center , Distributed by Harvard University Press, 2008, c2006
- : pbk
Available at 34 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
"First paperback edition 2008"--T.p. verso
Imprint date on t.p.: 2006
Includes bibliographical references (p. [357]-386) and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
Japan has long wrestled with the memories and legacies of World War II. In the aftermath of defeat, war memory developed as an integral part of particular and divergent approaches to postwar democracy. In the last six decades, the demands placed upon postwar democracy have shifted considerably-from social protest through high economic growth to Japan's relations in Asia-and the meanings of the war shifted with them.
This book unravels the political dynamics that governed the place of war memory in public life. Far from reconciling with the victims of Japanese imperialism, successive conservative administrations have left the memory of the war to representatives of special interests and citizen movements, all of whom used war memory to further their own interests.
Franziska Seraphim traces the activism of five prominent civic organizations to examine the ways in which diverse organized memories have secured legitimate niches within the public sphere. The history of these domestic conflicts-over the commemoration of the war dead, the manipulation of national symbols, the teaching of history, or the articulation of relations with China and Korea-is crucial to the current discourse about apology and reconciliation in East Asia, and provides essential context for the global debate on war memory.
by "Nielsen BookData"