Private property, community development, and eminent domain
著者
書誌事項
Private property, community development, and eminent domain
(Law, property and society / series editor, Robin Paul Malloy)
Ashgate, c2008
大学図書館所蔵 全2件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references (p. [203]-216) and index
収録内容
- Private property, community development, and eminent domain / Robin Paul Malloy and James Charles Smith
- Hysteria versus history : public use in the public eye / Michael Allan Wolf
- Kelo, the castle, and natural property rights / Eric R. Claeys
- Nothing "errant" about it : the Berman and Midkiff Conference notes and how the Supreme Court got to Kelo with its eyes wide open / D. Benjamin Barros
- Controls over the use and abuse of eminent domain in England : a comparative view / Tom Allen
- Federalism and localism in Kelo and San Remo / Marc R. Poirier
- Just compensation in an ownership society / Rachel D. Godsil and David Simunovich
- Kelo v. City of New London and the prospects for development after a natural disaster / Carol Necole Brown
内容説明・目次
内容説明
The contributors in this volume address the fundamental relationship between the state and its citizens, and among the people themselves. Discussion centers on a recent decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Kelo v. City of New London. This case involved the use of eminent domain power to acquire private property for purposes of transferring it by the State to another private party that would make "better" economic use of the land. This type of state action has been identified as an "economic development taking". In the Kelo case, the Court held that the action was legal within provisions of the US Constitution but the opinion was contentious among some of the Justices and has been met with significant negative outcry from the public. The Kelo case and the public debate arising in its aftermath give cause to assess the legal landscape related to the ability of government to fairly balance the tension between private property and the public interest. The tension and the need to successfully strike a balance are not unique to any one country or any one political system. From the United States to the United Kingdom, to the People's Republic of China, property and its legal regulation are of prime importance to matters of economic development and civic institution building. The Kelo decision, therefore, explores a rich set of legal principles with broad applicability.
目次
- Chapter 1 Private Property, Community Development, and Eminent Domain, Robin PaulMalloy, James CharlesSmith
- Chapter 2 Hysteria versus History, Michael AllanWolf
- Chapter 3 Kelo, the Castle, and Natural Property Rights, Eric R.Claeys
- Chapter 4 Nothing "Errant" About It, D. BenjaminBarros
- Chapter 5 Controls over the Use and Abuse of Eminent Domain in England, TomAllen
- Chapter 6 Federalism and Localism in Kelo and San Remo, Marc R.Poirier
- Chapter 7 Just Compensation in an Ownership Society, Rachel D.Godsil, DavidSimunovich
- Chapter 8 Kelo v. City of New London and the Prospects for Development after a Natural Disaster, Carol NecoleBrown
「Nielsen BookData」 より