Trials of reason : Plato and the crafting of philosophy
著者
書誌事項
Trials of reason : Plato and the crafting of philosophy
Oxford University Press, 2008
- : hbk
大学図書館所蔵 全4件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references and indexes
HTTP:URL=http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip0710/2007003713.html Information=Table of contents only
内容説明・目次
内容説明
Scholarship on Plato's dialogues persistently divides its focus between the dramatic or literary and the philosophical or argumentative dimensions of the texts. But this hermeneutic division of labor is naive, for Plato's arguments are embedded in dramatic dialogues and developed through complex, largely informal exchanges between literary characters. Consequently, it is questionable how readers can even attribute arguments and theses to the author himself. The
answer to this question lies in transcending the scholarly divide and integrating the literary and philosophical dimensions of the texts. This is the task of Trials of Reason.
The study focuses on a set of fourteen so-called early dialogues, beginning with a methodological framework that explains how to integrate the argumentation and the drama in these texts. Unlike most canonical philosophical works, the early dialogues do not merely express the results of the practice of philosophy. Rather, they dramatize philosophy as a kind of motivation, the desire for knowledge of goodness. They dramatize philosophy as a discursive practice, motivated by this desire and
ideally governed by reason. And they dramatize the trials to which desire and reason are subject, that is, the difficulties of realizing philosophy as a form of motivation, a practice, and an epistemic achievement. In short, Trials of Reason argues that Plato's early dialogues are as much works of
meta-philosophy as philosophy itself.
目次
- INTERPRETATION:
- Introduction
- Interpreting Plato
- The Political Culture of Plato's Early Dialogues
- Dialogue
- Character and History
- The Mouthpiece Principle
- Forms of Evidence
- DESIRE:
- Socrates as an Erotic Figure
- The Subjectivist Conception of Desire
- Instrumental and Irrational Desires
- Desire in the Critique of Akrasia
- Interpreting Lysis
- The Deficiency Conception of Desire
- Inathentic Friendship
- The Three-Dimensional Conception of Desire
- Anti-Philosophical Desires
- KNOWLEDGE:
- Excellence as Wisdom
- The Epistemic Unity of Excellence
- Dunamis and Techne
- Goodness and Form
- The Epistemological Priority of Definitional Knowledge
- Ordinary Ethical Knowledge
- METHOD:
- The Socratic Fallacy
- Socrates' Pursuit of Definitions
- Hupothesis
- Two Postulates
- The Geometrical Illustration
- Geometrical Analysis
- The Method of Reassuring from a Postulate
- Elenchus and Hupothesis
- Knowledge and Aitia
- F-conditions
- Cognitive Security
- APORIA:
- Forms of Aporia
- Dramatic Aporia
- The Example of Charmides
- Charmides as Autobiography
- The Politics of Sophrosune
- Critias' Philotimia
- Self-Knowledge and the Knowledge of Knowledge
- Knowledge of Knowledge and Knowledge of the Good Philosophy in the Polis
- APPENDICES:
- List of Commonly Used Greek Words
- The Irony of Socrates
- BIBLIOGRAPHY
「Nielsen BookData」 より