Concepts of "nature" and "the natural" in biotechnology debates
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Concepts of "nature" and "the natural" in biotechnology debates
(Philosophy and medicine, v. 97 . Altering nature ; v. 1)
Springer, c2008
Available at 11 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Includes bibliographic references and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
B. Andrew Lustig, Baruch A. Brody, and Gerald P. McKenny Nearly every week the general public is treated to an announcement of another actual or potential "breakthrough" in biotechnology. Headlines trumpet advances in assisted reproduction, current or prospective experiments in cloning, and devel- ments in regenerative medicine, stem cell technologies, and tissue engineering. Scientific and popular accounts explore the perils and the possibilities of enhancing human capacities by computer-based, biomolecular, or mechanical means through advances in artificial intelligence, genetics, and nanotechnology. Reports abound concerning ever more sophisticated genetic techniques being introduced into ag- culture and animal husbandry, as well as efforts to enhance and protect biodiversity. Given the pace of such developments, many insightful commentators have proclaimed the 21st century as the "biotechnology century. " Despite a significant literature on the morality of these particular advances in biotechnology, deeper ethical analysis has often been lacking. Our preliminary review of that literature suggested that current discussions of normative issues in biotechnology have suffered from two major deficiencies. First, the discussions have been too often piecemeal in character, limited to after-the-fact analyses of particular issues that provoked the debate, and unconnected to larger concepts and themes. Second, a crucial missing element of those discussions has been the failure to reflect explicitly on the diverse disciplinary conceptions of nature and the natural that shape moral judgments about the legitimacy of specific forms of research and their applications.
Table of Contents
- Introduction. "Altering Nature: Concepts of "Nature" and "The Natural" in Biotechnology Debates", by B. Andrew Lustig and Baruch Brody
- 1. "Spiritual and religious concepts of nature", by Aaron Mackler, Ebrahim Moosa, Allen Verhey, Anne Klein, and Kurt Peters
- 2. "Philosophical Approaches to Nature", by John H. Zammito, Philip J. Ivanhoe, Helen Longino, Phillip R. Sloan
- 3. "Scientific and Medical Concepts of Nature in the Modern Period in Europe and North America", by Laurence B. McCullough, John Caskey, Thomas R. Cole, and Andrew Wear
- 4. "Ethical Challenges of Patenting "Nature": Legal and Economic Accounts of Altered Nature as Property", by Mary Anderlik Majumder, Margaret Byrne, Elias Bongmba, Leslie Rothenberg, and Nancy Dubler
- 5. "Aesthetic and Representational Concepts of Nature", by Suzanne Anker, Susan Lindee, Edward Shanken, and Dorothy Nelkin.
by "Nielsen BookData"