Law, mind and brain
著者
書誌事項
Law, mind and brain
(Medical law and ethics)
Ashgate, c2009
大学図書館所蔵 全8件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
Over the past 20 years, cognitive neuroscience has revolutionized our ability to understand the nature of human thought. Working with the understandings of traditional psychology, the new brain science is transforming many disciplines, from economics to literary theory. These developments are now affecting the law and there is an upsurge of interest in the potential of neuroscience to contribute to our understanding of criminal and civil law and our system of justice in general. The international and interdisciplinary chapters in this volume are written by experts in criminal behaviour, civil law and jurisprudence. They concentrate on the potential of neuroscience to increase our understanding of blame and responsibility in such areas as juveniles and the death penalty, evidence and procedure, neurological enhancement and treatment, property, end-of-life choices, contracting and the effects of words and pictures in law. This collection suggests that legal scholarship and practice will be increasingly enriched by an interdisciplinary study of law, mind and brain and is a valuable addition to the emerging field of neurolaw.
目次
- Contents: Preface
- Introduction, Michael Freeman and Oliver R. Goodenough
- Law, responsibility and the brain, Dean Mobbs, Hakwan C. Lau, Owen D. Jones and Christopher D. Frith
- Brain imaging and courtroom evidence: on the admissibility and persuasiveness of fMRI, Neal Feigenson
- Mind the gap: problems of mind, body and brain in the criminal law, Lisa Claydon
- Self-exclusion agreements: should we be free not to be free to ruin ourselves? Gambling, self-exclusion agreements and the brain, Florian Wagner-Von Papp
- The problems with blaming, Theodore Y. Blumoff
- Why distinguish 'mental' and 'physical' illness in law of involuntary treatment?, John Dawson and George Szmukler
- A stable paradigm: revisiting capacity, vulnerability and the rights and claims of adolescents after Roper v. Simmons, Catherine J. Ross
- Thinking like a child: legal implications of recent developments in brain research for juvenile offenders, Katharine Hunt Federle and Paul Skendelas
- Legal implications of memory-dampening, Adam Kolber
- Reframing the good death: enhancing choice in dying, neuroscience, end-of-life research and the potential of psychedelics in palliative care, Robin Mackenzie
- Equality in exchange revisited from an evolutionary (genetic and cultural) point of view, Bart Du Laing
- Just (and efficient?) compensation for government expropriations, Jeffrey Evans Stake
- Examining the biological bases of family law: lessons to be learned from the evolutionary analysis of law, June Carbone and Naomi Cahn
- Why do good people steal intellectual property?, Oliver R.Goodenough and Gregory Decker
- Cues in the courtroom: when do they improve jurors' decisions?, Cheryl Boudreau
- Reflections on reading: words and pictures and law, Christina Spiesel
- Index.
「Nielsen BookData」 より