Descartes on forms and mechanisms
著者
書誌事項
Descartes on forms and mechanisms
Cambridge University Press, 2009
大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全9件
-
該当する所蔵館はありません
- すべての絞り込み条件を解除する
この図書・雑誌をさがす
注記
Includes bibliographical references (p. 226-231) and index
収録内容
- Descartes' arguments against the substantial form
- Aquinas' introduction of the substantial form
- Suarez's defense of the substantial form
- Sanchez's skeptical humanist attack
- The mechanical alternative to substantial forms
- Cartesian science and the principles of Aristotelian mechanics
- Atoms, modes, and other heresies
- Descartes' metaphysical alternative to substantial forms
内容説明・目次
内容説明
The modern view of causation can be traced back to the mechanistic science of Descartes, whose rejection of Aristotelian physics, with its concept of substantial forms, in favor of mechanical explanations was a turning-point in the history of philosophy. However the reasoning which led Descartes and other early moderns in this direction is not well understood. This book traces Descartes' groundbreaking theory of scientific explanation back to the mathematical demonstrations of Aristotelian mechanics and interprets these advances in light of the available arguments for and against substantial forms. It also examines how Descartes' new theory led him to develop a metaphysical foundation for his science that could avoid skeptical objections. It will appeal to a wide range of readers interested in the philosophy and science of the early modern period.
目次
- Introduction
- Part I. Resurrecting the Substantial Form: 1. Descartes' arguments against the substantial form
- 2. Aquinas' introduction of the substantial form
- 3. Suarez's defense of the substantial form
- Part II. Challenging the Substantial Form: 4. Sanchez's skeptical humanist attack
- 5. The mechanical alternative to substantial forms
- 6. Cartesian science and the principles of mechanics
- Part III. Eliminating Substantial Forms: 7. Atoms, modes and other heresies
- 8. Descartes' metaphysical alternative to substantial forms
- Conclusion.
「Nielsen BookData」 より