Mistake, fraud and duties to inform in European contract law
著者
書誌事項
Mistake, fraud and duties to inform in European contract law
(The common core of European private law / general editors, Mauro Bussani, Ugo Mattei)
Cambridge University Press, 2008
- : pbk
大学図書館所蔵 全5件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Originally published: 2005
Includes bibliographical references and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
This 2005 examination of twelve case studies about mistake, fraud and duties to inform reveals significant differences about how contract law works in thirteen European legal systems and, despite the fact that the solutions proposed are often similar, what divergent values underlie the legal rules. Whereas some jurisdictions recognise increasing duties to inform in numerous contracts so that the destiny of mistake and fraud (classical defects of consent) may appear to be uncertain, other jurisdictions continue to refuse such duties as a general rule or fail to recognise the need to protect one of the parties where there is an imbalance in bargaining power or information. Avoiding preconceptions as to where and why these differences exist, this book first examines the historical origins and development of defects of consent, then considers the issues from a comparative and critical standpoint.
目次
- Preface
- List of contributors
- Table of legislation
- List of abbreviations
- 1. General introduction Ruth Sefton-Green
- 2. Mistake, misrepresentation and precontractual duties to inform: the civil law tradition Martin Josef Schermaier
- 3. The rise and fall of mistake in the English law of contract John Cartwright
- 4. Case studies: Case 1: Anatole v. Bob
- Case 2: Celimene v. Damien
- Case 3: Emile v. Far Eastern Delights
- Case 4: Mr and Mrs Timeless v. Mr and Mrs Careless
- Case 5: Bruno v. The Local Garage
- Case 6: Emmanuel v. The Computer Shop
- Case 7: Cinderella
- Case 8: Estella v. Uriah Heep
- Case 9: Nell v. Scrooge Bank
- Case 10: Zachary
- Case 11: Monstrous Inventions Ltd v. Mary Shelley
- Case 12: Lady Windermere v. Angel
- 5. Comparative conclusions Ruth Sefton-Green
- Index.
「Nielsen BookData」 より