Why dominant parties lose : Mexico's democratization in comparative perspective

著者

    • Greene, Kenneth F.

書誌事項

Why dominant parties lose : Mexico's democratization in comparative perspective

Kenneth F. Greene

Cambridge University Press, 2009, c2007

  • : pbk.

大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全8件

この図書・雑誌をさがす

注記

"First paperback edition 2009"--T.p. verso

Includes bibliographical references (p. 311-331) and index

内容説明・目次

内容説明

Why have dominant parties persisted in power for decades in countries spread across the globe? Why did most eventually lose? Why Dominant Parties Lose develops a theory of single-party dominance, its durability, and its breakdown into fully competitive democracy. Greene shows that dominant parties turn public resources into patronage goods to bias electoral competition in their favor and virtually win elections before election day without resorting to electoral fraud or bone-crushing repression. Opposition parties fail because their resource disadvantages force them to form as niche parties with appeals that are out of step with the average voter. When the political economy of dominance erodes, the partisan playing field becomes fairer and opposition parties can expand into catchall competitors that threaten the dominant party at the polls. Greene uses this argument to show why Mexico transformed from a dominant party authoritarian regime under PRI rule to a fully competitive democracy.

目次

  • Part I. The Macro Perspective: 1. A theory of single-party dominance and opposition party development
  • 2. Dominant party advantages and opposition party failure, 1930s-90s
  • Part II. The Micro Perspective: 3. Why participate? A theory of elite activism in dominant party systems
  • 4. The empirical dynamics of elite activism
  • Part III. Implications: 5. Constrained to the core: opposition party organizations, 1980s-90s
  • 6. Dominance defeated: voting behavior in the 2000 elections
  • 7. Extending the argument: Italy, Japan, Malaysia, and Taiwan.

「Nielsen BookData」 より

詳細情報

ページトップへ