The argument from injustice : a reply to legal positivism

著者

書誌事項

The argument from injustice : a reply to legal positivism

Robert Alexy ; translated by Bonnie Litschewski Paulson and Stanley L. Paulson

Oxford University Press, 2010, c2002

  • : pbk

タイトル別名

Begriff und Geltung des Rechts

大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全14件

この図書・雑誌をさがす

注記

Originally published: Freiburg : Karl Alber, c1994

内容説明・目次

内容説明

At the heart of this book is the age-old question of how law and morality are related. The legal positivist, insisting on the separation of the two, explicates the concept of law independently of morality. The author challenges this view, arguing that there are, first, conceptually necessary connections between law and morality and, second, normative reasons for including moral elements in the concept of law. While the conceptual argument alone is too limited to establish a sufficiently strong connection between law and morality, and the normative argument alone fails to address the nature of law, the two arguments together support a nonpositivistic concept of law, toppling legal positivism qua comprehensive theory of law. The author makes his case within a conceptual framework of five distinctions that can be variously combined to represent a multiplicity of presuppositions or perspectives underlying the enquiry into the relationship of law and morality. In this context, it can indeed be shown that there are perspectives that bespeak solely a positivistic concept of law. The decisive point, however, is that there is a perspective, necessary to the law, that necessarily presupposes a nonpositivistic concept of law. This is the perspective of a participant in the legal system, asking for the correct answer to a legal question in this legal system. The participant-thesis is demonstrated by appeal to Gustav Radbruch's formula (extreme injustice is not law) and to the judge's balancing of principles in deciding a concrete case. The author arrives at a concept of law that systematically links classical elements of legal positivism - authoritative issuance and social efficacy - with the desideratum of nonpositivistic legal theory, correctness of content.

目次

  • I THE PROBLEM OF LEGAL POSITIVISM
  • 1. The Basic Positions
  • 2. The Practical Significance of the Debate
  • II THE CONCEPT OF LAW
  • 1. Central Elements
  • 2. Positivistic Concepts of Law
  • 3. Critique of Positivistic Concepts of Law
  • III THE VALIDITY OF LAW
  • 1. Concepts of Validity
  • 2. Collisions of Validity
  • 3. Basic Norm
  • IV DEFINITION

「Nielsen BookData」 より

詳細情報

ページトップへ