Allegations of UK complicity in torture : twenty-third report of session 2008-09 : report, together with formal minutes and oral and written evidence
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Allegations of UK complicity in torture : twenty-third report of session 2008-09 : report, together with formal minutes and oral and written evidence
(HL paper, 152)(HC, 230)
Stationery Office, 2009
- Other Title
-
Twenty-third report from the Joint Committee on Human Rights : allegations of UK complicity in torture session 2008-09
Available at 1 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
"Ordered by the House of Lords to be printed 21 July 2009. Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 21 July 2009"
Description and Table of Contents
Description
There have been a number of reports that UK security services have been complicit in the torture of UK nationals held in Pakistan and elsewhere. Complicity in torture is a direct breach of the UK's international human rights obligations. In the Committee's view, complicity in torture exists where a state: asks a foreign intelligence service known to use torture to detain and question an individual; provides information to a foreign intelligence service known to use torture; gives questions to a foreign intelligence service to put to a detainee who has been, is being, or is likely to be tortured; sends interrogators to question a detainee who is known to have been tortured; has intelligence personnel present at an interview with a detainee in a place where he is being, or might have been, tortured; and/or, systematically receives information known, or thought likely, to have been obtained from detainees subjected to torture. The Committee's conclusions and recommendations include the following: the Government appears to have been determined to avoid parliamentary scrutiny on this issue.
The Government must take measures to improve the system of accountability for the intelligence and security services. The Government should aim to make the Intelligence and Security Committee a proper parliamentary select committee with independent advice and reporting to Parliament, not the Prime Minister. The Government should publish all versions of guidance given to intelligence and security service personnel about detaining and interviewing individuals overseas and make public all relevant legal opinions provided to ministers. There should be an independent inquiry into the allegations.
by "Nielsen BookData"