Curbing bailouts : bank crises and democratic accountability in comparative perspective
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Curbing bailouts : bank crises and democratic accountability in comparative perspective
(New comparative politics)
University of Michigan Press, c2009
- : cloth
Available at 5 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Bibliography: p. 187-198
Includes index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
Do democratic governments and authoritarian regimes respond to banking crises in the same way? Banking crises threaten the stability and growth of economies around the world. In response, politicians restore banks to solvency by redistributing losses from bank shareholders and depositors to taxpayers. Whereas some governments stay close to the prescriptions espoused by Sir Walter Bagehot in the 19th century that limit the costs shouldered by taxpayers, others engage in generous bank bailouts at great cost to society. In this comparative analysis of late 20th-century banking crises, Guillermo Rosas identifies political regime type as the determining factor. Compared with authoritarian regimes, democratic regimes show a lower propensity toward dramatic, costly bailouts.
by "Nielsen BookData"