Fundamentalism in American religion and law : Obama's challenge to patriarchy's threat to democracy
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Fundamentalism in American religion and law : Obama's challenge to patriarchy's threat to democracy
Cambridge University Press, 2010
- : hardback
Available at 5 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Bibliography: p. 279-299
Includes index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
Why, from Reagan to George Bush, have fundamentalists in religion and in law (originalists) exercised such political power and influence in the United States? Why has the Republican Party forged an ideology of judicial appointments (originalism) hostile to abortion and gay rights? Why and how did Barack Obama distinguish himself among Democratic candidates not only by his opposition to the Iraq war but by his opposition to originalism? This book argues that fundamentalism in both religion and law threatens democratic values and draws its appeal from a patriarchal psychology still alive in our personal and political lives and at threat from the constitutional developments since the 1960s. The argument analyzes this psychology (based on traumatic loss in intimate life) and resistance to it (based on the love of equals). Obama's resistance to originalism arises from his developmental history as a democratic, as opposed to patriarchal, man who resists the patriarchal demands on men and women that originalism enforces - in particular, the patriarchal love laws that tell people who and how and how much they may love.
Table of Contents
- Introduction: defining the problem
- 1. The progressive recognition of human rights under American constitutional law
- Part I. Fundamentalism in Law: 2. The fundamentalism of constitutional originalism
- 3. The motivations of constitutional fundamentalism
- Part II. Fundamentalism in Religion: 4. Fundamentalism in Roman Catholicism
- 5. Fundamentalism among Protestants
- 6. Mormon fundamentalism
- Part III. Fundamentalism in Law and Religion: 7. Patriarchal roots of constitutional fundamentalism
- 8. Fundamentalism in religion and law
- Conclusion: patriarchy as the American dilemma.
by "Nielsen BookData"