Banking crisis : regulation and supervision : fourteenth report of session 2008-09 : report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence
著者
書誌事項
Banking crisis : regulation and supervision : fourteenth report of session 2008-09 : report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence
(HC, 767)
Stationery Office, 2009
大学図書館所蔵 全1件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
At head of title: House of Commons, Treasury Committee
"Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 21 July 2009"
内容説明・目次
内容説明
This report considers how regulation and supervision have changed, and can be further improved, in order to return to and maintain more stable banking. The Committee considers the reforms to the institutional structure of the Tripartite Committee announced in the Treasury's recent White Paper, "Reforming Financial Markets (Cm. 7667)" (ISBN 9780101766722) to be largely cosmetic. There is still a lack of clarity regarding who is responsible for systemic oversight and who has executive authority in a crisis. But in the Committee's view no new macroprudential responsibilities should be allocated until a decision has been made about the precise tools needed. Examining the Financial Services Authority's (FSA) response to the financial crisis, the Committee recognises that the regulatory philosophy of the FSA has changed for the better, though the real test will be when the boom years return. Many banks are systematically significant because they are too big, they conduct many types of business, or they are too complex and interconnected.
The report addresses each of these issues in turn concluding that, though it is unlikely that all banks could be shrunk to a size where they posed no systemic risk, the Government can and should still act. On the question of a return to 'traditional banking', the report concludes that it would be intolerable if banks took advantage of the implicit Government guarantee for deposits to take risky bets on proprietary trading.
「Nielsen BookData」 より