Reproductive technologies
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Reproductive technologies
(Opposing viewpoints series)
Greenhaven Press, c2007
- : pbk
- Other Title
-
Opposing viewpoints
Available at / 1 libraries
-
No Libraries matched.
- Remove all filters.
Note
Includes bibliographical references (p. 220-223) and index
Contents of Works
- Reproductive technologies destroy families / Tricia Smith Vaughan
- Reproductive technologies help families / Bonnie Gilbert
- Egg donation puts women at risk / Judy Norsigian
- Egg donation brings joy to women / Heidi and "Tawni," interviewed by Nell Bernstein
- Future harms of reproductive technologies are worth opposing now / Sujatha Jesudason
- Embryos deserve the moral status of persons / Rogeer Hoedemaekers
- Embryos do not deserve the moral status of persons / Michael J. Sandel
- A secular regard for the human body means restricting reproductive technologies / Ingrid Schneider
- A secular regard for human liberty means allowing reproductive technologies / John A. Robertson
- Intervention in god's plan for natural reproduction is wrong / John B. Shea
- Religion should not interfere in bioethics / George Dvorsky
- Some reproductive technologies should be suspended / Elizabeth Marquardt
- Some reproductive technologies should be allowed to proceed with caution / Paul Lauritzen
- Sex selection technologies should be left to parental choice / Edgar Dahl
- Sex selection technologies should not be left to parental choice / Marcy Darnovsky
- Older women should be allowed to use reproductive technologies to become mothers / Jennie Bristow
- Older women should be discouraged from using reproductive technologies to become mothers / Jamie Borland
- The government should support embryo adoptions / Daniel I. Wallance
- Embryo adoptions are a waste of government money / Arthur Caplan
- Research cloning is a threat / Charles Krauthammer
- Research cloning is not likely to be a threat / Robin Marantz Henig
- Parents should be free to use "designer baby" technologies / Krista Conger
- Society should restrict "designer baby" technologies / Shannon Brownlee