Building states and markets after communism : the perils of polarized democracy
著者
書誌事項
Building states and markets after communism : the perils of polarized democracy
(Cambridge studies in comparative politics)
Cambridge University Press, 2010
- : hardback
- : pbk
大学図書館所蔵 全11件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Bibliography: p. 255-282
Includes ndex
内容説明・目次
内容説明
Does democracy promote the creation of market economies and robust state institutions? Do state-building and market-building go hand in hand? Or do they work at cross-purposes? This book examines the relationship between state-building and market-building in 25 post-communist countries from 1990 to 2004. Based on cross-national statistical analyses, surveys of business managers, and case studies from Russia, Bulgaria, Poland, and Uzbekistan, Timothy Frye demonstrates that democracy is associated with more economic reform, stronger state institutions, and higher social transfers when political polarization is low. But he also finds that increases in political polarization dampen the positive impact of democracy by making policy less predictable. He traces the roots of political polarization to high levels of income inequality and the institutional legacy of communist rule. By identifying when and how democracy fosters markets and states, this work contributes to long-standing debates in comparative politics, public policy, and post-communist studies.
目次
- Introduction
- 1. The political logic of economic and institutional reform
- 2. Political polarization and economic inequality
- 3. The pace and consistency of reform
- 4. Political polarization and economic growth
- 5. Polarization and policy instability: the view from the firm
- 6. Nationalism and endogenous polarization
- 7. Russia: polarization, autocracy and inconsistent reform
- 8. Bulgaria: polarization, democracy and inconsistent reform
- 9. Poland: robust democracy and rapid reform
- 10. Uzbekistan: autocracy and inconsistent gradualism
- 11. Conclusion.
「Nielsen BookData」 より