Sorry states : apologies in international politics
著者
書誌事項
Sorry states : apologies in international politics
（Cornell studies in security affairs / edited by Robert J. Art, Robert Jervis, and Stephen M. Walt）（Cornell paperbacks）
Cornell University Press, [2010], c2008
- : pbk
大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全31件
-
該当する所蔵館はありません
- すべての絞り込み条件を解除する
注記
"First published 2008 by Cornell University Press. First printing, Cornell paperbacks, 2010."--T.p. verso
Includes bibliographical references and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
Governments increasingly offer or demand apologies for past human rights abuses, and it is widely believed that such expressions of contrition are necessary to promote reconciliation between former adversaries. The post-World War II experiences of Japan and Germany suggest that international apologies have powerful healing effects when they are offered, and poisonous effects when withheld. West Germany made extensive efforts to atone for wartime crimes-formal apologies, monuments to victims of the Nazis, and candid history textbooks; Bonn successfully reconciled with its wartime enemies. By contrast, Tokyo has made few and unsatisfying apologies and approves school textbooks that whitewash wartime atrocities. Japanese leaders worship at the Yasukuni Shrine, which honors war criminals among Japan's war dead. Relations between Japan and its neighbors remain tense.
Examining the cases of South Korean relations with Japan and of French relations with Germany, Jennifer Lind demonstrates that denials of past atrocities fuel distrust and inhibit international reconciliation. In Sorry States, she argues that a country's acknowledgment of past misdeeds is essential for promoting trust and reconciliation after war. However, Lind challenges the conventional wisdom by showing that many countries have been able to reconcile without much in the way of apologies or reparations. Contrition can be highly controversial and is likely to cause a domestic backlash that alarms-rather than assuages-outside observers. Apologies and other such polarizing gestures are thus unlikely to soothe relations after conflict, Lind finds, and remembrance that is less accusatory-conducted bilaterally or in multilateral settings-holds the most promise for international reconciliation.
「Nielsen BookData」 より
