The European Company Law Action Plan revisited : reassessment of the 2003 priorities of the European Commission
著者
書誌事項
The European Company Law Action Plan revisited : reassessment of the 2003 priorities of the European Commission
Leuven University Press, c2010
- : pbk
大学図書館所蔵 全10件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references
内容説明・目次
内容説明
The harmonisation of company law has always been on the agenda of the European Union. Besides the protection of third parties affected by business transactions, the founders had two other objectives: first, promoting freedom of establishment, and second, preventing the abuse of such freedom. In fact, the fear of the Netherlands becoming the ‘Delaware of Europe’ (in terms of competition among Member States) seemed real, until, ironically, at the beginning of the 21st century, it was the privilege of the Dutch (and the Danish) state to fail in making the abuse argument before the European Court of Justice. The Court was apparently at ease since comparative law research had shown that the U.S. model of state competition was more fruitful than harmful: Delaware had, among U.S states, developed the most sophisticated corporate law, and nurtured the country’s most experienced company law judges. Therefore the Commission felt ready to refocus its company law strategy. On the basis of the so-called Winter Group Report, it wrote its Company Law Action Plan, which was issued on 21 May 2003. Now, six years later, a revisit is appropriate. In this volume researchers of the Jan Ronse Institute for Company law of the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven present five papers on the main priorities of the Action Plan: capital and creditor protection, corporate governance, one share one vote, financial reporting, and corporate mobility. The book also includes responses and ensuing discussions by reputed European company law experts. The conclusion of the book is written by Jaap Winter.
目次
Table of Content
Preface by K. Geens and K.J. Hopt
The European Company Law Action Plan Revisited: An Introduction by K.J. Hopt
I. Reforming Legal Capital: Harmonisation or Fragmentation of Creditor Protection?
Paper by J.M. Nelissen Grade and M. Wauters
Response by J. Rickford
Discussion (Chair D. Martin)
II. Corporate Governance in a European Perspective
Paper by H. Laga and F. Parrein
Response by E. Wymeersch
Discussion (Chair P. Davies)
III. One Share One Vote: Fairness, Efficiency and EU Harmonisation Revisited
Paper by K. Geens and C. Clottens
Response by J.M. Garrido Garcia
Discussion (Chair P. Montagnon)
IV. Belgian and European Accounting Law 30 years after the Fourth EC Directive. A route planner in a landscape scattered with (a growing number of) crossroads
Paper by K. Van Hulle and F. Hellemans
Response by H. Beckman and Peter Van der Zanden
Discussion (Chair H. Olivier)
V. Corporate Mobility
Paper by M. Wyckaert and F. Jenné
Response by L. Timmerman
Discussion (Chair J. Meyers)
Transcript of Panel Debate
The European Union's Involvement in Company Law and Corporate Governance
Conclusion by J. Winter
「Nielsen BookData」 より