Legal theory and the social sciences
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Legal theory and the social sciences
(The library of essays in contemporary legal theory, v. 2)
Ashgate, c2010
Available at 19 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Includes bibliographical references and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
Ever since H.L.A. Hart's self-description of The Concept of Law as an 'exercise in descriptive sociology', contemporary legal theorists have been debating the relationship between legal theory and sociology, and between legal theory and social science more generally. There have been some who have insisted on a clear divide between legal theory and the social sciences, citing fundamental methodological differences. Others have attempted to bridge gaps, revealing common challenges and similar objects of inquiry. Collecting the work of authors such as Martin Krygier, David Nelken, Brian Tamanaha, Lewis Kornhauser, Gunther Teubner and Nicola Lacey, this volume - the second in a three volume series - provides an overview of the major developments in the last thirty years. The volume is divided into three sections, each discussing an aspect of the relationship of legal theory and the social sciences: 1) methodological disputes and collaboration; 2) common problems, especially as they concern different modes of explanation of social behaviour; and 3) common objects, including, most prominently, the study of language in its social context and normative pluralism.
Table of Contents
- Contents: Introduction
- Part I Methodology: Collaborations and Disputes: The Concept of Law and social theory, Martin Krygier
- Legal theory and social theory, Kim Lane Scheppele
- An analytical map of social scientific approaches to the concept of law, Brian Z. Tamanaha
- Why must legal ideas be interpreted sociologically?, Roger Cotterrell
- Analytical jurisprudence versus descriptive sociology revisited, Nicola Lacey
- Legal research and the social sciences, Christopher McCrudden
- Is law really a social science? A view from comparative law, Geoffrey Samuel. Part II Common Problems: Modes of Explanation of Behaviour: How the law thinks: towards a constructivist epistemology of law, Gunther Teubner
- Law and spontaneous order: Hayek's contribution to legal theory, A.I. Ogus
- The normativity of law, Lewis A. Kornhauser
- Using the concept of legal culture, David Nelken
- The law as social practice: are shared activities at the foundations of law?, Matthew Noah Smith. Part III Common Objects: Modes of Explanation of Legal Phenomena: Law as tradition, Martin Krygier
- Language, law, and social meanings: linguistic/anthropological contributions to the study of law, Elizabeth Mertz
- Mute law, Rodolfo Sacco
- Social science and diffusion of law, William Twining
- Understanding legal pluralism: past to present, local to global, Brian Z. Tamanaha
- Name index.
by "Nielsen BookData"