Financial management in the European Union
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Financial management in the European Union
(Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General / Comptroller and Auditor General)(HC, 34 . Session 2009-2010)
Stationery Office, 2010
Available at 1 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
At head of title: National Audit Office
"Ordered by House of Commons to be printed on 10 June 2010."
"11June 2010."
Description and Table of Contents
Description
There has been a detectable improvement over recent years in the financial management of European funds across the European Union, but seemingly intractable problems with reducing the high levels of error in some significant areas of EU spending still remain. "Financial Management in the European Union (HC 34)" reports that the European Court of Auditors provided a positive Statement of Assurance, without qualification, on the reliability of the European Union's accounts for 2008. However, for the fifteenth successive year, the Court did not provide a positive Statement of Assurance on whether the underlying transactions conformed to applicable laws and regulations. Material error (error in excess of 2 per cent of total expenditure in a policy area) was found in categories making up some 53 per cent of total expenditure, including Cohesion Policy funds, which are still associated with the highest level of error in the EU budget, and Rural Development.
This title features the following findings : while controls can be tightened and administration improved, many of these high levels of error are in part down to the sheer complexity of administering the programmes in question; some changes have been introduced for programmes in the 2007-2013 period, but it is too early to judge their impact; weaknesses in the administration of European programmes in the UK continue to have an impact on the taxpayer; during 2008-09, the Commission confirmed GBP 140 million of disallowances of expenditure; and, UK departments have made provisions for some GBP 350 million of further disallowances and reported the potential for liabilities beyond that.
by "Nielsen BookData"