Landmark cases in family law
著者
書誌事項
Landmark cases in family law
Hart, 2011
大学図書館所蔵 全11件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
There are a number of important (landmark) cases in the development of Family Law in England and Wales that deserve detailed examination and lend themselves particularly well to historical examination. Family law cases tend to raise highly controversial issues, often on striking facts, frequently provoking wider social debate and/or extensive publicity. Consequently, the landmark cases chosen for this collection provide considerable scope, not only for doctrinal analysis and explanation of the importance and impact of the decisions, but also for in-depth examination of the social or policy developments that influenced them. The stories behind the cases provide a fascinating insight into the complexities of family life and the drama that can be found in the family courts.
In recent years, Family Law has seen enormous changes in law's engagement with the notion of 'family', with the enactment, for example, of the Civil Partnership Act 2004, the Gender Recognition Act 2004 and, more recently, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008. As we begin to move forward into the new millennium, this is an excellent time to engage in detailed analyses and 'stock-taking' of the landmark decisions, many of which were decided in the 1970s, and which have shaped modern Family Law. This book provides a series of in-depth studies of the key leading cases, and will be of interest to students and lecturers alike.
目次
- 1. Introduction: A Journey Through the Landmark Cases of Family Law Stephen Gilmore, Jonathan Herring and Rebecca Probert 2. The Roos Case (1670) The Roos Case and Modern Family Law Rebecca Probert 3. J v C [1970] AC 668 J v C: Placing the Child's Welfare Centre Stage Nigel Lowe 4. Corbett v Corbett (Otherwise Ashley)[1971] P 83 Corbett v Corbett: Once a Man, Always a Man? Stephen Gilmore 5. Szechter (Orse Karsov) v Szechter [1971] P 286 'But I Didn't Really Want to Get Married' David McClean and Mary Hayes 6. Poel v Poel [1970] 1 WLR 1469 Poels Apart: Fixed Principles and Shifting Values in Relocation Law Rachel Taylo r 7. S v S
- W v Official Solicitor [1972] AC 24 Welfare, Truth and Justice: The Children of Extra-marital Liaisons Andrew Bainham 8. Wachtel v Wachtel [1973] Fam 72 Bringing an End to the Matrimonial Post Mortem: Wachtel vWachtel and its Enduring Significance for Ancillary Relief Gillian Douglas 9. Marckx v Belgium (1979-80) 2 EHRR 14 The Marckx Case: A 'Whole Code of Family Law'? Walter Pintens and Jens M Scherpe 10. Burns v Burns [1984] Ch 317 Burns v Burns: The Villain of the Piece? John Mee 11. Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority and Department of Health and Social Security [1986] AC 112 The Gillick Decision - Not Just a High-water Mark Jane Fortin 12. R v R [1992] 1 AC 599 No More Having and Holding: The Abolition of the Marital Rape Exemption Jonathan Herring 13. Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association [2001] 1 AC 27 Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association: A Perfectly Pitched Stall Lisa Glennon 14. White v White [2000] 1 AC 596 A Late Instalment in a Long Story Elizabeth Cooke
「Nielsen BookData」 より