Reappraising the resort to force : international law, jus ad bellum and the War on Terror
著者
書誌事項
Reappraising the resort to force : international law, jus ad bellum and the War on Terror
（Studies in international law, v. 27）
Hart, 2011
- : pbk
大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全5件
-
該当する所蔵館はありません
- すべての絞り込み条件を解除する
注記
"First published in 2010, reprinted in paperback in 2011"--T.p. verso
Bibliography: p. [157]-172
Includes index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
A number of commentators assert that the military response to the terrorist atrocities of 11 September 2001 - encompassing attacks on Afghanistan and Iraq, and commonly referred to as the 'war on terror' - has significantly impacted upon the international law regulating resort to armed force by states (jus ad bellum), loosening the constraints on self-defence. Some even suggest that the very future of the United Nations, in particular the Security Council and its collective security system, is at risk - at least in its current form. This book does not address the question of the future of the United Nations, an issue probably best left to scholars of international relations. Instead, it seeks to place the 'war on terror' within the context of international law, assessing how, or whether, it can be accommodated within the existing legal framework limiting the use of force. Through an examination of the lawfulness (or otherwise) of both Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom, including the legal justifications advanced by those states involved and the reaction of the international community, and involving a detailed discussion of the most important developments (ie, the permissibility of self-defence against non-state, terrorist, actors and the 'Bush doctrine' of pre-emptive self-defence against terrorists as proclaimed in the 2002 US National Security Strategy) the book determines whether, and to what extent, the right to use force - or the acceptability of such military action - is currently undergoing a radical transformation. By assessing subsequent developments illustrating the impact that military action against Afghanistan and Iraq has had on the jus ad bellum, this book represents a distinctive and original contribution to the academic literature.
目次
Introduction
1: General Legal Framework 1945-2001: The UN Charter Paradigm and the Jus ad Bellum
I. The Prohibition of the Use of Force
II. The Use of Force in Self-Defence
A. Anticipatory Self-Defence
B. The Definition of 'Armed Attack' and Self-Defence against Non-State Actors
III. Security Council Authorisation
2: Military Action Against Afghanistan, 2001: Operation Enduring Freedom
I. Was there an Armed Attack on the United States?
II. Was the Response Necessary?
A. Was the Attack Over?
B. Was the State of Afghanistan a Legitimate Target?
III. Was the Response Proportionate?
3: Military Action Against Iraq, 2003: Operation Iraqi Freedom
I. Was the Action Taken in Self-Defence?
II. Was the Action Authorised by the Security Council?
A. Was Military Action Authorised by Resolution 1441?
B. Was Military Action Authorised as a Lawful Response to the Violation of the Ceasefire Agreement?
4: Reappraising the Resort to Force? Jus ad Bellum in the Post-9/11 World
I. International Court of Justice Jurisprudence
A. The Oil Platforms Case
B. The Palestinian Wall Advisory Opinion
C. The Armed Activities Case
II. State Practice
A. Israeli Military Operations in Lebanon and Syria
B. Russian Military Operations in Georgia
C. Ethiopian Military Operations in Somalia
III. A Reappraisal
「Nielsen BookData」 より