The First Amendment and related statutes : problems, cases and policy arguments
著者
書誌事項
The First Amendment and related statutes : problems, cases and policy arguments
(University casebook series)
Thomson Reuters/Foundation Press, 2011
4th ed
大学図書館所蔵 全6件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Originally published 2001; 2nd ed. 2005, 3rd ed. 2008
Includes index
HTTP:URL=http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/fy11pdf03/2011414465.html Information=Table of contents only
内容説明・目次
内容説明
The Fourth Edition casebook examines United States First Amendment law using expertly edited cases, original note materials, and class questions. The Fourth Edition includes, among other things, an improved structure: The vagueness and overbreadth discussion has been moved earlier in the material, so that vagueness and overbreadth can be taught as pervasive First Amendment doctrines rather than as isolated items in the "procedural rules" section. The anonymous speech/association material has been grouped together in a separate section, so that the cases some of which were formerly in the compelled speech section and some in the expressive association section can be better taught together. The right not to contribute money material has been moved together with the right not to speak material, so that the cases some of which were formerly in the expressive association section can be better taught together. Important added cases include: Incitement to crime: United States v. Williams, 553 U.S. 285 (2008). Child pornography / speech intrinsically related to crime: United States v. Stevens, 130 S. Ct. 1577 (2010), and Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co., 336 U.S. 490 (1949).Strict scrutiny: Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, 130 S. Ct. __ (2010).Campaign speech and money: Citizens United v. FEC, 130 S. Ct. 876 (2010). Content-neutrality: Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, 130 S. Ct. __ (2010) (excerpt).Government as subsidizer: Christian Legal Society v. Martinez, 130 S. Ct. __ (2010).Anonymous speech: Citizens United v. FEC, 130 S. Ct. 876 (2010) (excerpt) and Doe v. Reed, 130 S. Ct. __ (2010).
「Nielsen BookData」 より