The First Amendment and related statutes : problems, cases and policy arguments
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
The First Amendment and related statutes : problems, cases and policy arguments
(University casebook series)
Thomson Reuters/Foundation Press, 2011
4th ed
Available at 6 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Originally published 2001; 2nd ed. 2005, 3rd ed. 2008
Includes index
HTTP:URL=http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/fy11pdf03/2011414465.html Information=Table of contents only
Description and Table of Contents
Description
The Fourth Edition casebook examines United States First Amendment law using expertly edited cases, original note materials, and class questions. The Fourth Edition includes, among other things, an improved structure: The vagueness and overbreadth discussion has been moved earlier in the material, so that vagueness and overbreadth can be taught as pervasive First Amendment doctrines rather than as isolated items in the "procedural rules" section. The anonymous speech/association material has been grouped together in a separate section, so that the cases some of which were formerly in the compelled speech section and some in the expressive association section can be better taught together. The right not to contribute money material has been moved together with the right not to speak material, so that the cases some of which were formerly in the expressive association section can be better taught together. Important added cases include: Incitement to crime: United States v. Williams, 553 U.S. 285 (2008). Child pornography / speech intrinsically related to crime: United States v. Stevens, 130 S. Ct. 1577 (2010), and Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co., 336 U.S. 490 (1949).Strict scrutiny: Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, 130 S. Ct. __ (2010).Campaign speech and money: Citizens United v. FEC, 130 S. Ct. 876 (2010). Content-neutrality: Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, 130 S. Ct. __ (2010) (excerpt).Government as subsidizer: Christian Legal Society v. Martinez, 130 S. Ct. __ (2010).Anonymous speech: Citizens United v. FEC, 130 S. Ct. 876 (2010) (excerpt) and Doe v. Reed, 130 S. Ct. __ (2010).
by "Nielsen BookData"