Ideology, psychology, and law
著者
書誌事項
Ideology, psychology, and law
(Series in political psychology)
Oxford University Press, c2012
大学図書館所蔵 全5件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
Formally, the law is based solely on reasoned analysis, devoid of ideological biases or unconscious influences. Judges claim to act as umpires applying the rules, not making them. They frame their decisions as straightforward applications of an established set of legal doctrines, principles, and mandates to a given set of facts. As most legal scholars understand, however, the impression that the legal system projects is largely an illusion. As far back as 1881,
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. made a similar claim, writing that "the felt necessities of the time, the prevalent moral and political theories, intuitions of public policy, avowed or unconscious, even the prejudices which judges share with their fellow-men, have a good deal more to do than the syllogism in
determining the rules by which men should be governed."
More than a century later, we are now much closer to understanding the mechanisms responsible for the gap between the formal face of the law and the actual forces shaping it. Over the last decade or so, political scientists and legal academics have begun studying the linkages between ideologies, on one hand, and legal principles and policy outcomes on the other. During that same period, mind scientists have turned to understanding the psychological sources of ideology. This book is the first to
bring many of the world's experts on those topics together to examine the sometimes unsettling interactions between psychology, ideology, and law, and to better understand what, beyond and beneath the logic, animates the law.
目次
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 - Introduction: Ideology, Psychology, and Law
- Jon Hanson
- Chapter 2 - The End of the End of Ideology
- John Jost
- Correlates and Causes of Ideology
- Chapter 3 - System Justification Theory and Research: Implications for Law, Legal Advocacy, and Social Justice
- Gary Blasi and John Jost
- Chapter 4 - Interpersonal Foundations of Ideological Thinking
- Curtis Hardin, Rick M. Cheung, Michael W. Magee, Steven Noel, and Kasumi Yoshimura
- Chapter 5 - Crowding Out Morality: How the Ideology of Self-Interest Can Be Self-Fulfilling
- Barry Schwartz
- Chapter 5 Legal Comment - "A Fine is Not a Price": Insights for Law
- Anne L. Alstott
- Chapter 6 - Associations Between Law, Competitiveness, and the Pursuit of Self-Interest
- Mitch Callan and Aaron Kay
- Chapter 6 Legal Comment - "You Call, I Hammer!": Adversarial Legalism and Social Influence
- Douglas Kysar
- Chapter 7 - Automatic Associations: Personal Attitudes or Cultural Knowledge
- Eric Uhlmann, Andrew Poehlman, and Brian Nosek
- Chapter 7 Legal Comment
- Jerry Kang
- Chapter 8 - The Policy IAT
- Jon Hanson and Mark Yeboah
- Chapter 9 - Attributions and Ideologies: Two Divergent Visions of Human Behavior Behind Our Laws, Policies, and Theories
- Adam Benforado and Jon Hanson
- Protection and Preservation of Ideology
- Chapter 10 - Preference, Principle, and Political Casuistry
- Eric Knowles and Peter Ditto
- Chapter 10 Legal Comment - Warm Reasoning and Legal Proof of Discrimination
- Martha Chamallas
- Chapter 11 - Identity, Belief, and Bias
- Geoffrey Cohen
- Chapter 11 Legal Comment - Remedying Law's Partiality Through Social Science
- Andrew Perlman
- Chapter 12 - Bias Perception and the Spiral of Conflict
- Kathleen Kennedy and Emily Pronin
- Chapter 12 Legal Comment - The Lawyer as Bias Buffer or Bias Aggravator
- Robert Bordone
- Chapter 13 - Seeing Bias: Discrediting and Dismissing Accurate Attributions
- Adam Benforado and Jon Hanson
- Ideology in Legal Theory and Law
- Chapter 14 - Backlash: The Reaction to Mind Sciences in Legal Academia
- Adam Benforado and Jon Hanson
- Chapter 15 - The Mystique of Instrumentalism
- Tom Tyler and Lindsay Rankin
- Chapter 16 - Aggressive Interrogation and Retributitve Justice: A Proposed Psychological Model Retribution.
- Avani Mehta Sood and Kevin Carlsmith
- Legal Comment - How to Advocate Against Torture? Understanding and Countering the Dynamics of Support for Abusive Interrogation
- James Cavallaro
- Chapter 17 - Two Social Psychologists' Reflections on Situationism and the Criminal Justice System.
- Lee Ross and Donna Shestowsky
- Chapter 18 - What's Love Got to Do with It?: Stereotypical Women in Dispositionist Torts.
- Fernanda Nicola
- Chapter 19 - Legal Interpretation and Intuitions of Public Policy
- Josh Furgeson and Linda Babcock
- Chapter 20 - Ideology and the Study of Judicial Behavior
- Lee Epstein, Andrew D. Martin, Kevin M. Quinn, and Jeffrey A. Segal
- Chapter 21 - Depoliticizing Administrative Law
- Cass Sunstein and Thomas Miles
「Nielsen BookData」 より