Promises of states under international law
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Promises of states under international law
(Studies in international law, v. 37)
Hart, 2012
Available at 17 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Includes bibliographical references (p. [323]-331) and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
Textbooks on international law, dicta of the International Court of Justice and the International Law Commission's 'Guiding Principles applicable to unilateral declarations of states capable of creating legal obligations' of 2006, all reflect the fact that in international law a state's unilateral declaration can create a legally binding obligation. Unilateral declarations are common, as a look at the weekly headlines of any major newspaper will reveal. Many of the declarations made at the highest level are, of course, vaguely expressed and carry no tangible legal commitment. But others deliver a very clear message: for instance the US's April 2010 declaration on its future use of nuclear weapons or Kosovo's declaration of independence and pledge to follow the Ahtisaari Plan, are two recent and prominent examples of unilateral declarations at the international level.
The same sources, however, also reveal that while state promises are accepted as a means for states to create full blown legal commitments, the law governing such declarations is far from clear. This monograph fills a gap in international legal scholarship by raising and answering the question of the precise legal value of such pledges in the realm of public international law.
After a brief introduction state promises in international law are defined and contrasted with other unilateral acts of states, and the history of promises in state practice and court decisions is delineated, together with scholarly opinion. The book then provides a detailed picture of the international legal framework governing promises of states, and ends with a brief assessment of the raison d'etre for promises as a binding mechanism in international law, along with their advantages and disadvantages in comparison with the classical mechanism for assuming international obligations - the international treaty.
This is currently the only book to present a comprehensive overview of the legal effect of promises by states in international law.
Table of Contents
Introduction
I The Presumed Rareness of Promises
II A Legal Framework with Many Open Questions: A First Look
III The Need for a Clear Assessment of the Applicable Law
IV Approaching the Topic
1 Delimiting the Subject: Promise as a Unilateral Act
I Drawing from the Definition of Unilateral Acts
II Distinguishing Promises from Other Classes of Unilateral Acts
III A Manifestation of Will to Create a Legal Obligation
IV Unilateral
V Promises of States Only
2 A History of Promises
I Important Cases and State Practice
II Concluding Remarks on the History of Promises
3 The Law on Promises
I Promises and the Sources of International Law
II The ILC's Guiding Principles
III Legal Basis for the Bindingness of Unilateral Promises
IV On the Intention to be Legally Bound
V Further Requirements
VI The Revocability of Promises
VII Modifying Promises
VIII Promises and Estoppel
IX Summarising the Legal Framework
4 Looking Ahead: A 'Promising' Future?
I Straitjacket vs Empowering Rule
II Unilateral Promises and Bilateral Commitments
Concluding Remarks
by "Nielsen BookData"