The composition of the Gospel of Thomas : original language and influences
著者
書誌事項
The composition of the Gospel of Thomas : original language and influences
（Monograph series / Society for New Testament Studies, 151）
Cambridge University Press, 2012
- : hardback
大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全7件
-
該当する所蔵館はありません
- すべての絞り込み条件を解除する
注記
Bibliography: p. 271-302
Includes indexes
内容説明・目次
内容説明
This book addresses two central questions in current research on the Gospel of Thomas: what was its original language and which early Christian works influenced it? At present, theories of Thomas as a Semitic work abound. Simon Gathercole dismantles these approaches, arguing instead that Thomas is Greek literature and that the matter of Thomas's original language is connected with an even more controverted question: that of the relationship between Thomas and the canonical New Testament. Rather than being independent of Matthew, Mark and Luke (as in most Western Aramaic theories of Thomas) or thoroughly dependent on the four gospels (as in most Syriac approaches), Gathercole develops a newly refined approach to how Thomas is influenced by the Synoptic Gospels. Thomas can be seen to refer to Matthew as a gospel writer, and evidence is discussed showing that Thomas incorporates phraseology distinctive to Luke, while also extending that special Lukan language.
目次
- Introduction
- Part I. The Original Language of Thomas: 1. The problem of the original language of Thomas
- 2. Methodological problems with Semitic theories
- 3. Arguments against Semitisms
- 4. Positive evidence for a Greek-language origin
- Part II. The Synoptic Gospels and Thomas: 5. Arguments against independence
- 6. Thomas and the Synoptics: a method for assessing influence
- 7. Matthew in the Gospel of Thomas
- 8. Luke in the Gospel of Thomas
- 9. The influence of Matthew and Luke: summary and evaluation
- Part III. Thomas and Other Early Christian Literature: 10. Paul in the Gospel of Thomas
- 11. Hebrews in the Gospel of Thomas
- 12. The 'two ways' source and the Gospel of Thomas
- Conclusion.
「Nielsen BookData」 より