Print, visuality, and gender in eighteenth-century satire : "the scope in ev'ry page"
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Print, visuality, and gender in eighteenth-century satire : "the scope in ev'ry page"
(Routledge studies in eighteenth-century literature, 8)
Routledge, 2011
- : hbk
Available at 3 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Includes bibliographical references (p. [218]-229) and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
This study interprets eighteenth-century satire's famous typographical obsession as a fraught response to the Enlightenment's "ocularcentric" epistemological paradigms, as well as to a print-cultural moment identified by book-historians as increasingly "visual" - a moment at which widespread attention was being paid, for the first time, to format, layout, and eye-catching advertising strategies. On the one hand, the Augustans were convinced of the ability of their elaborately printed texts to function as a kind of optical machinery rivaling that of the New Science, enhancing readers' physical but also moral vision. On the other hand, they feared that an overly scrutinizing gaze might undermine the viewer's natural faculty for candor and sympathy, delight and desire. In readings of Pope, Swift, and Montagu, Mannheimer shows how this distrust of the empirical gaze led to a reconsideration of the ethics, and most specifically the gender politics, of ocularcentrism. Whereas Montagu effected this reconsideration by directly satirizing both the era's faith in the visual and its attendant publishing strategies, Pope and Swift pursued their critique via print itself: thus whether via facing-page translations, fictional editors, or disingenuous footnotes, these writers sought to ensure that typography never became either a mere tool of (or target for) the objectifying gaze, but rather that it remained a dynamic and interactive medium by which readers could learn both to see and to see themselves seeing.
Table of Contents
Introduction 1: From Speech-Act to Spectacle: Changing Modes of Satire at the Turn of the Eighteenth Century 2: Swift's Tableaux, Montagu's Table-Turning: Verse, Visuality, and Gender 3: Augustan Satire's Textual Bodies: The Quest for an Ethics of the Eye 4: Pedagogies of Paranoia, Spaces of Adjudication: Swift and Pope's Typographical Training-Grounds of the Gaze 5: "That Spirit He Pretends to Imitate": Pope, Montagu, and the Letter and the Spirit of the Law 6: Crossing Stage and Page: Pope's Four-Book Dunciad and the Critique of "Absorptive" Textuality Coda: Theatricalized Print and the Reciprocal Gaze: Gender Politics in Pope's Printed Playhouse
by "Nielsen BookData"