Logics of legitimacy : three traditions of public administration praxis
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Logics of legitimacy : three traditions of public administration praxis
(Public administration and public policy, 168)
CRC Press, c2013
- : hardback
Available at 15 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Bibliography: p. 253-285
Includes index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
The discipline of public administration draws predominantly from political and organizational theory, but also from other social and behavioral sciences, philosophy, and even theology. This diversity results in conflicting prescriptions for the "proper" administrative role. So, how are those new to public administration to know which ideas are "legitimate"?
Rather than accepting conventional arguments for administrative legitimacy through delegated constitutional authority or expertise, Logics of Legitimacy: Three Traditions of Public Administration Praxis does not assume that any one approach to professionalism is accepted by all scholars, practitioners, citizens, or elected representatives. Instead, it offers a framework for public administration theory and practice that fully includes the citizen as a political actor alongside elected representatives and administrators. This framework:
Considers both direct and representative forms of democracy
Examines concepts from both political and organizational theory, addressing many of the key questions in public administration
Examines past and present approaches to administration
Presents a conceptual lens for understanding public administration theory and explaining different administrative roles and practices
The framework for public administration theory and practice is presented in three traditions of main prescriptions for practice: Constitutional (the bureaucrat), Discretionary (the entrepreneur), and Collaborative (the steward). This book is appropriate for use in graduate-level courses that explore the philosophical, historical, and intellectual foundations of public administration. Upon qualified course adoption, instructors will gain access to a course outline and corresponding lecture slides.
Table of Contents
Why and How the Traditions Framework Was Created. The Legitimacy Question. Why Worry about Role Conceptualization? Professional Socialization in Public Administration. Using Theoretical Frameworks as Interpretive Lenses. How the Traditions Framework Was Created. The Traditions Framework. The Generic Elements of Each Tradition. The Constitutional Tradition-Bureaucratic Accountability to the Constitutional Order. The Discretionary Tradition-Entrepreneurial Responsibility for Desirable Outcomes. The Collaborative Tradition-Stewardship Responsiveness to the Citizenry. Critique and Analysis. Mutual Critiques among Traditions. Integrations, Conciliations, and Dialectical Syntheses. Assessing Contextual Fit of the Traditions-A Mental Experiment. Appendix: Foundations Course Outline.
by "Nielsen BookData"