Simplicius on the planets and their motions : in defense of a heresy

Bibliographic Information

Simplicius on the planets and their motions : in defense of a heresy

by Alan C. Bowen

(Philosophia antiqua, v. 133)

Brill, 2013

  • : hardback

Available at  / 7 libraries

Search this Book/Journal

Note

"Aristotelis De caelo commentaria"--CIP on t.p. verso

Includes bibliographical references (p. [299]-311) and indexes

Description and Table of Contents

Description

Though the digression closing Simplicius' commentary on Aristotle's De caelo 2.12 has long been misread as a history of early Greek planetary theory, it is in fact a creative reading of Aristotle to maintain the authority of the De caelo as a sacred text in Late Platonism and to refute the polemic mounted by the Christian, John Philoponus. This book shows that the critical question forced on Simplicius was whether his school's acceptance of Ptolemy's planetary hypotheses entailed a rejection of Aristotle's argument that the heavens are made of a special matter that moves by nature in a circle about the center of the cosmos and, thus, a repudiation of the thesis that the cosmos is uncreated and everlasting.

Table of Contents

Preface Acknowledgments Conventions List of Figures The Argument Introduction 1. The Heresy of Non-Homocentric Aetherial Motion 2. The Heretical Rejection of All Hypotheses 3. Simplicius, the Apologist 4. Simplicius, the Historian 5. Conclusion Translation In de caelo 2.10 The proportionality of the planetary speeds In de caelo 2.11 The sphericity of the wandering stars In de caelo 2.12 The proportionality of the planetary motions Figures Comments In de caelo 2.10 In de caelo 2.11 In de caelo 2.12 Bibliography Index of Passages Passages in I.G. Kidd 1988-1999, vol.1 Index of Names Index of Subjects

by "Nielsen BookData"

Related Books: 1-1 of 1

Details

Page Top